#226: Re: GTI 138 VS GTI 180 Author: E5GDM, Location: EssexPosted: Fri Dec 10, 2010 5:50 am ----
Edward wrote:
E5GDM wrote:
the only other reason not to get a 180 over a 138 is if you can't afford the running costs.
Apart from the reason I have stated.
Especially not your reason.
#227: Re: GTI 138 VS GTI 180 Author: Danny., Location: PeterboroughPosted: Fri Dec 10, 2010 5:53 am ---- Is this still going on..
#228: Re: GTI 138 VS GTI 180 Author: lofty, Location: Near ManchesterPosted: Fri Dec 10, 2010 6:04 am ---- Seems so.
I'm quite bored of arguing with someone with blinkered views who quite clearly cannot see that a 180 will cost quite a bit more than a similar aged 138 (give or take a year or so).
#229: Re: GTI 138 VS GTI 180 Author: |SGP|, Location: Truro/Falmouth, CornwallPosted: Fri Dec 10, 2010 6:34 am ---- Some will some won't.
Regardless, the 180 is a better car, and the only reasons not to get one over the 138 is if your budget limits you, or you want to mess with the insides.
#230: Re: GTI 138 VS GTI 180 Author: E5GDM, Location: EssexPosted: Fri Dec 10, 2010 7:08 am ----
lofty wrote:
Seems so.
I'm quite bored of arguing with someone with blinkered views who quite clearly cannot see that a 180 will cost quite a bit more than a similar aged 138 (give or take a year or so).
I know the feeling Stevie Wonder!
But why would I 'clearly' see your point that a 180 'will cost quite a bit more than a similar aged 138'?. Myself & others have proven that there's mint low mileage 180's out there that are going for around the same price, if not less in some cases than the 138. Your wrong, So at least have the balls to admit it like no offences did about R32's going for £1500.
What SGP says above is what I've been saying from 15 pages ago, but you still can't see it! Last edited by E5GDM on Fri Dec 10, 2010 7:11 am; edited 1 time in total
#231: Re: GTI 138 VS GTI 180 Author: Mattie-RS, Location: A Track near you ;)Posted: Fri Dec 10, 2010 7:09 am ---- Lets face it there both s**t cars,, end of story!!
#232: Re: GTI 138 VS GTI 180 Author: Bailey, Location: Finding Dr. RobotnikPosted: Fri Dec 10, 2010 7:13 am ---- Yea micras are alot better!
#233: Re: GTI 138 VS GTI 180 Author: DJ-, Location: UKPosted: Fri Dec 10, 2010 7:14 am ---- The 180's are selling for dirt cheap because nobody is buying them which imo means its worth getting one over the 138 if you have the funds for the extra insurance,tax, fuel etc.
If you thinking of doing engine mods then its a different story.
#234: Re: GTI 138 VS GTI 180 Author: |SGP|, Location: Truro/Falmouth, CornwallPosted: Fri Dec 10, 2010 7:16 am ----
Mattie-VTs wrote:
Lets face it there both s**t cars,, end of story!!
you cant say that until you're no longer driving something french yourself
Also I think no offences meant a skyline R32, which is ugly as sin, and has no mod cons, so would be horrible for every day driving, regardless of the speed. Last edited by |SGP| on Fri Dec 10, 2010 7:20 am; edited 1 time in total
#235: Re: GTI 138 VS GTI 180 Author: Mattie-RS, Location: A Track near you ;)Posted: Fri Dec 10, 2010 7:20 am ----
|SGP| wrote:
Mattie-VTs wrote:
Lets face it there both s**t cars,, end of story!!
you cant say that until you're no longer driving something french yourself
I agree,, prefer my C2 other the 206 tho
Even tho it is a Shitroen
#236: Re: GTI 138 VS GTI 180 Author: lofty, Location: Near ManchesterPosted: Fri Dec 10, 2010 8:03 am ----
E5GDM wrote:
lofty wrote:
Seems so.
I'm quite bored of arguing with someone with blinkered views who quite clearly cannot see that a 180 will cost quite a bit more than a similar aged 138 (give or take a year or so).
I know the feeling Stevie Wonder!
But why would I 'clearly' see your point that a 180 'will cost quite a bit more than a similar aged 138'?. Myself & others have proven that there's mint low mileage 180's out there that are going for around the same price, if not less in some cases than the 138. Your wrong, So at least have the balls to admit it like no offences did about R32's going for £1500.
What SGP says above is what I've been saying from 15 pages ago, but you still can't see it!
Mate - are you an idiot?
I have searched myself and found that most 138's go for at least a grand less than a similar aged 180.
I'm done with arguing over something i've weighed up myself countless times over the past 5 years..
#237: Re: GTI 138 VS GTI 180 Author: E5GDM, Location: EssexPosted: Fri Dec 10, 2010 9:16 am ----
lofty wrote:
Mate - are you an idiot?
I have searched myself and found that most 138's go for at least a grand less than a similar aged 180.
I'm done with arguing over something i've weighed up myself countless times over the past 5 years..
Your argument would have been valid 5 years ago, as the 180's were relatively new. But you must be the idiot to still be coming to the same conclusion half a decade on. As for what 180's 'go for', are you getting asking price confused with the price they eventually sell for? Anyway, it would still be worth a grand extra to most people.
#238: Re: GTI 138 VS GTI 180 Author: lofty, Location: Near ManchesterPosted: Fri Dec 10, 2010 1:30 pm ---- The argument stands - The 'better' car goes for more money. How is that not clear as day?
#239: Re: GTI 138 VS GTI 180 Author: Lee, Location: EnglandPosted: Fri Dec 10, 2010 1:35 pm ---- Standard vs Standard, the GTi180 is better. However, it is a pretty poor hot hatch, and there's better out there for the same money.
You're like kids comparing your willy in the showers
#240: Re: GTI 138 VS GTI 180 Author: Ash, Location: Running from Ant and Lee and Adam...........Posted: Fri Dec 10, 2010 1:41 pm ----
Lee wrote:
Standard vs Standard, the GTi180 is better. However, it is a pretty poor hot hatch, and there's better out there for the same money.
You're like kids comparing your willy in the showers
We are not responsible for comments posted by our users, as they are the property of the poster
Interactive software released under GNU GPL,
Code Credits,
Privacy Policy