New Here?
Toggle Content
   

Toggle Content User Info
Welcome

Anonymous

Nickname
Password
Register

Membership:
Latest: Andyblue64
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 17123

Online Now [147]:
Visitors: 146
Bots: 1
Members: 0
Staff Online Now:

No staff members are online!
Page Views:
Today: 66583
Total: 99291307

Toggle Content Main Menu
 General Info Goodies Search Web Stats Members
 Donations

 

Forums ›

:: Forums ›
twin webers?
-> 206 Talk

#1: twin webers? Author: DJ-, Location: UK PostPosted: Sat Dec 18, 2010 8:33 pm
    ----
What is this thing?

cgi.ebay.co.uk/twin-45...19c1d4f5c4

#2: Re: twin webers? Author: Seabook PostPosted: Sat Dec 18, 2010 8:51 pm
    ----
twin barrel carburetors.

can't believe these things are still on the market lol

#3: Re: twin webers? Author: Mattie-RS, Location: A Track near you ;) PostPosted: Sat Dec 18, 2010 9:03 pm
    ----
webers are carbs aint they

#4: Re: twin webers? Author: Seabook PostPosted: Sat Dec 18, 2010 9:04 pm
    ----
Mattie-VTs wrote:
webers are carbs aint they

ya thats what i remember Confused

but what pug use carbs these day? Confused

#5: Re: twin webers? Author: Mattie-RS, Location: A Track near you ;) PostPosted: Sat Dec 18, 2010 9:14 pm
    ----
Seabook wrote:
Mattie-VTs wrote:
webers are carbs aint they

ya thats what i remember Confused

but what pug use carbs these day? Confused

none lol i know that vag engine respond well to bike webers,, remember the polo does!

Doubt they have been done on a pug much before

#6: Re: twin webers? Author: tomd0801754, Location: Moscow PostPosted: Sat Dec 18, 2010 9:23 pm
    ----
Most of the other stuff he is selling is from a 205.

#7: Re: twin webers? Author: Edward, Location: In the garage PostPosted: Sun Dec 19, 2010 3:45 am
    ----
You'd also have to find a way of providing the ignition...carbs are a step backwards in terms of technology.

#8: Re: twin webers? Author: Nimminz, Location: Durham, NE England, UK PostPosted: Sun Dec 19, 2010 4:22 am
    ----
carbs stopped being fitted to production cars at 1993 IIRC same with when catalytic convertors came in.

Last carburetted production car sold in UK was a Volvo 400 IIRC.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carburetor

Its just another intake + fuelling system. Could probably be fitted to any car with enough work.

#9: Re: twin webers? Author: Twidly, Location: Home - Norfolk, Uni - Preston PostPosted: Sun Dec 19, 2010 5:24 am
    ----
Weber is some guy who invented magnetic flux density Wink It has the symbol B... Go figure, god I hate A2 Physics!

#10: Re: twin webers? Author: Mike PostPosted: Sun Dec 19, 2010 5:29 am
    ----
They also sound awesome when set up correctly.

#11: Re: twin webers? Author: mjsroofing, Location: south wales PostPosted: Sun Dec 19, 2010 5:33 am
    ----
you can use twin webers on any engine, but you will need to do some mods, electrical wise, most banger racing cars use webers and old rally cars, twin 45's were very comman, and can add soem bhp to

#12: Re: twin webers? Author: Spanerman, Location: Neath, South Wales. PostPosted: Sun Dec 19, 2010 5:40 am
    ----
Throttle bodies are today equivalent Smile

Much better fuel metering!

#13: Re: twin webers? Author: Seabook PostPosted: Sun Dec 19, 2010 8:22 am
    ----
mjsroofing wrote:
you can use twin webers on any engine, but you will need to do some mods, electrical wise, most banger racing cars use webers and old rally cars, twin 45's were very comman, and can add soem bhp to

that's what i don't understand. so do you mean carb is better than electronic fuel injections? Question

#14: Re: twin webers? Author: Mattie-RS, Location: A Track near you ;) PostPosted: Sun Dec 19, 2010 9:30 am
    ----
Seabook wrote:
mjsroofing wrote:
you can use twin webers on any engine, but you will need to do some mods, electrical wise, most banger racing cars use webers and old rally cars, twin 45's were very comman, and can add soem bhp to

that's what i don't understand. so do you mean carb is better than electronic fuel injections? Question

It aint lol

Webers were what we use Throttle Bodies for now,,

They where a inproved carb system like TB's would be on my new car Razz

#15: Re: twin webers? Author: Spanerman, Location: Neath, South Wales. PostPosted: Sun Dec 19, 2010 10:23 am
    ----
Yeah, the better atomisation and metering of injection put carbs to sleep about 20 years a go Smile

#16: Re: twin webers? Author: Aaronwillis, Location: Ipswich PostPosted: Sun Dec 19, 2010 10:45 am
    ----
I used to have a xr2 on twin 45s

#17: Re: twin webers? Author: Nimminz, Location: Durham, NE England, UK PostPosted: Sun Dec 19, 2010 11:45 am
    ----
twin 45s are what my car would have if i had the money, either that or a big ol' turbo

#18: Re: twin webers? Author: mjsroofing, Location: south wales PostPosted: Sun Dec 19, 2010 11:54 am
    ----
they are better than injection systems because you can tune them more, injection systems are much better for mpg and reliability and emissions, weber just throw s**t loads of fuel in

#19: Re: twin webers? Author: DJ-, Location: UK PostPosted: Sun Dec 19, 2010 12:05 pm
    ----
Ah ok was just wondering what theyre were for.. Smile

#20: Re: twin webers? Author: Edward, Location: In the garage PostPosted: Sun Dec 19, 2010 12:08 pm
    ----
mjsroofing wrote:
they are better than injection systems because you can tune them more, injection systems are much better for mpg and reliability and emissions, weber just throw s**t loads of fuel in

Completely untrue.

#21: Re: twin webers? Author: mjsroofing, Location: south wales PostPosted: Sun Dec 19, 2010 12:14 pm
    ----
Edward wrote:
mjsroofing wrote:
they are better than injection systems because you can tune them more, injection systems are much better for mpg and reliability and emissions, weber just throw s**t loads of fuel in

Completely untrue.

correct me then...

#22: Re: twin webers? Author: Howey, Location: Kings Lynn PostPosted: Sun Dec 19, 2010 12:19 pm
    ----
Carbs are wasteful and need constant setting up from what I remember

#23: Re: twin webers? Author: mjsroofing, Location: south wales PostPosted: Sun Dec 19, 2010 12:22 pm
    ----
Howey wrote:
Carbs are wasteful and need constant setting up from what I remember

true as i said above

#24: Re: twin webers? Author: mjsroofing, Location: south wales PostPosted: Sun Dec 19, 2010 12:24 pm
    ----
carbs can be better than injection systems depending on what you want them for, please inform me of which bit i said that is "Completely untrue"

#25: Re: twin webers? Author: Howey, Location: Kings Lynn PostPosted: Sun Dec 19, 2010 12:25 pm
    ----
mjsroofing wrote:
carbs can be better than injection systems depending on what you want them for, please inform me of which bit i said that is "Completely untrue"

Im not disagreeing and it wasnt me who said that...

#26: Re: twin webers? Author: mjsroofing, Location: south wales PostPosted: Sun Dec 19, 2010 12:28 pm
    ----
Howey wrote:
mjsroofing wrote:
carbs can be better than injection systems depending on what you want them for, please inform me of which bit i said that is "Completely untrue"

Im not disagreeing and it wasnt me who said that...

sorry my mistake i was on a couple of sites then and got mixed up, easy for things to get a little heated some times in it. sorry mate.

#27: Re: twin webers? Author: Mattie-RS, Location: A Track near you ;) PostPosted: Sun Dec 19, 2010 1:05 pm
    ----
Id bet Throttle bodies are better than Webers

Much more control with TB's than Webers

#28: Re: twin webers? Author: mjsroofing, Location: south wales PostPosted: Sun Dec 19, 2010 1:16 pm
    ----
yeah your right enough mate, theh only time they are better is when you have a kit car or simalar and cant have the wiring ecu set up, or if you cant chip/remap an ecu to get the bhp , so i would think its rare now that ant one would use them but you can get some wicked performance out of a set of twin 45's and they sound great. it all depends what you want then for i supose

#29: Re: twin webers? Author: Mattie-RS, Location: A Track near you ;) PostPosted: Sun Dec 19, 2010 1:21 pm
    ----
Definatly,, i aint doubting them atall just technology has moved on

#30: Re: twin webers? Author: mjsroofing, Location: south wales PostPosted: Sun Dec 19, 2010 1:25 pm
    ----
Mattie-VTs wrote:
Definatly,, i aint doubting them atall just technology has moved on

yur right enough mate it has, hence kit cars, and bangers racing so its easier to set up kill switches etc, very rear you see them now.

#31: Re: twin webers? Author: Rob2859, Location: Halifax PostPosted: Sun Dec 19, 2010 2:01 pm
    ----
bout a webber carb for my dads kit car when we had it. much better over the standard carb but injection is much better. With carbs the fuel vapour is drawn in with the air current rather than being pumped directly into the cylinders

#32: Re: twin webers? Author: Edward, Location: In the garage PostPosted: Sun Dec 19, 2010 2:14 pm
    ----
Carbs are prehistoric mechanical things which are less reliable, require more servicing and don't give any more power than the modern equivalent - the fuel injected throttle body. Electronic fuel injection gives you the ability to give the engine exactly the right amount of fuel throughout the rev range, this can't be done with carbs. Carbs can give the same peak bhp figures as fuel injected cars but they can't match EFI through the rest of the rev range.

Banger racers don't use twin carbs. They use a single downdraught carb.

Just to clarify something. A single carb is comparable to a single point injection throttle body. Twin sidedraught carbs are comparable to independent throttle bodies.

 



-> 206 Talk


Page 1 of 1
 
We are not responsible for comments posted by our users, as they are the property of the poster
Interactive software released under GNU GPL, Code Credits, Privacy Policy