New Here?
Toggle Content
   

Toggle Content User Info
Welcome

Anonymous

Nickname
Password
Register

Membership:
Latest: Makomeister18274
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 1
Overall: 17122

Online Now [238]:
Visitors: 237
Bots: 1
Members: 0
Staff Online Now:

No staff members are online!
Page Views:
Today: 12473
Total: 97791538

Toggle Content Main Menu
 General Info Goodies Search Web Stats Members
 Donations

 

Forums ›

:: Forums ›
206 turbo (280bhp) Vs Porshe 996 Turbo (500bhp)
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  :| |:
-> 206 Talk

#76: Re: 206 turbo (280bhp) Vs Porshe 996 Turbo (500bhp) Author: 206gt160, Location: Blackburn PostPosted: Fri Jul 05, 2013 3:50 pm
    ----
Just read this post and forget all the arguing this car he has, is an absolute gem and you can hold your head high. I'm on with my build now Very Happy

#77: Re: 206 turbo (280bhp) Vs Porshe 996 Turbo (500bhp) Author: T18sty_206, Location: Luton, Beds PostPosted: Fri Jul 05, 2013 5:47 pm
    ----
Forums are jokes. 1st time I've ever witnessed someone admit that they're wrong though so fair play eddie206!!!!

Thanks for the positive comments (you know who you are)

#78: Re: 206 turbo (280bhp) Vs Porshe 996 Turbo (500bhp) Author: eddie206 PostPosted: Sat Jul 06, 2013 6:20 am
    ----
Im not one of these cranks that argues for the sake of it..it just seems so slow and its still bugging me a bit but the facts are all there on the car stats site..
Even a veyron does 0-60in 2.6 and 60-100 in2.9 closer figures but still beaten by the lower speeds..
Anyway im sure i saw clarkson on TG go mad for a merc that did the approx 60-100 in a mad fast time that may have been an exception to the rule..im thinkin it was a a very big engined cl500amg or sumthing like that...must have been a repeat from around 2008?..

#79: Re: 206 turbo (280bhp) Vs Porshe 996 Turbo (500bhp) Author: lee1985, Location: North West PostPosted: Sat Jul 06, 2013 6:42 am
    ----
I said originally "with the exception of a very few supercars"

There are some supercars that complete the 60-100 faster. The Koenigsegg CCXR is one example.
There are others. But as a rule, 0-60 is always faster for the reasons already explained

#80: Re: 206 turbo (280bhp) Vs Porshe 996 Turbo (500bhp) Author: eddie206 PostPosted: Sat Jul 06, 2013 7:31 am
    ----
Yeah...ive got that now...ok?
Its funny that...how youve gone from"not knowing much" and "needing it explaining in dummy technology"
In just under a month youve gone from dummy not knowing much...to expert know it all..
It amazes me the rate some people learn things these days...
Thats from not understanding the basic susspension on a car to being a professor on the inner workings of momentum and the forces and friction of acceleration on a moving body.....Amazin..

#81: Re: 206 turbo (280bhp) Vs Porshe 996 Turbo (500bhp) Author: RichardEke, Location: Doncaster PostPosted: Sun Sep 08, 2013 3:55 pm
    ----
This has been a good, entertaining read Very Happy

Very nice 206, can't imagine how much time and effort has been put into creating that.

1 thing i would say to eddie206, instead of thinking in terms of physics i'd just like to through my 2cents in there.
Going from 0-10mph on a pushbike will be quicker than 10-20mph cause its that much harder to do the 2nd acceleration. Exactly the same with cars.
E5GDM Is right with the physics though.
Just to explain about what Lee1985 said, the 60-100mph is only faster if the cars have a savage enough acceleration and the slingshot from the 1st 0-60mph helps to overcome drag, also depends where the engine is in its power/torque band.
Still a great read Smile
Regards, Richard.

#82: Re: 206 turbo (280bhp) Vs Porshe 996 Turbo (500bhp) Author: wes180 PostPosted: Mon Sep 09, 2013 1:12 pm
    ----
just my 50p but if the 996 was proper nailing it wouldnt it be making alot more noise?

www.youtube.com/watch?v=sI_nCtCS5H0

#83: Re: 206 turbo (280bhp) Vs Porshe 996 Turbo (500bhp) Author: LiamMiller PostPosted: Sun Jun 01, 2014 10:28 am
    ----
LOL, as if I'm only just reading this thread now, bringing this back up (with knowledge on physics from uni, actually scrap that, basic physics from school!), the faster the car goes the more air resistance there is, 0-60 has barely any air resistance, but as said before, when the speed increases, the air resistance does too. So this the 206 GTi 180 takes what 7 seconds to get to 60, correct? then takes another 14 seconds to get to 100 (figures rounded up or down) it takes treble the time to do that extra 40 to get to 100 (7x3=21), same with the zonda (3 and a bit seconds to 60, 9 and a bit to 100). This isn't hard and eddies theory is no where near correct.
P.S Sorry for bringing this back up LOL



-> 206 Talk


Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  :| |:

Page 6 of 6
 
We are not responsible for comments posted by our users, as they are the property of the poster
Interactive software released under GNU GPL, Code Credits, Privacy Policy