Author
|
Message |
|
Posted: Mon Aug 30, 2010 1:03 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 26, 2010 Posts: 3432
Trade Rating: +1
Location: Kent
|
|
Like a simile...
Right kk
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 30, 2010 1:13 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 07, 2010 Posts: 892
Trade Rating: 0
Location: Birmingham
|
|
A 1.4 8v can do just over 110mph, not 95 lol Or is that not the point?
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 30, 2010 1:16 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 21, 2010 Posts: 3945
Trade Rating: +45
Location: basingstoke
|
|
Dave wrote: |
A 1.4 8v can do just over 110mph, not 95 lol Or is that not the point? |
that is s**t really because my old p reg 1.1 saxo could do 115 and that was backed up by sat nav
| | |
|
|
|
| | |
| PAST -2008 Vauxhall Astra VXR / 2002 pug 206 GTI
PRESENT - VW Golf GTI Semi - Auto
Now have my 106 GTI track car
TEAM - I HATE FACEBOOK | |
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 30, 2010 1:18 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 07, 2010 Posts: 902
Trade Rating: +5
Location: chester
|
|
meady wrote: |
Dave wrote: |
A 1.4 8v can do just over 110mph, not 95 lol Or is that not the point? |
that is s**t really because my old p reg 1.1 saxo could do 115 and that was backed up by sat nav |
i'd go with that mate had ton out of my 1.1 206 and its not meant to do bob on slightly below but again read 100 on the satnav also. . .I don't think that is the point in the argument though as cant see someone spitting their dummy out over something so small.
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 30, 2010 1:24 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 21, 2010 Posts: 3945
Trade Rating: +45
Location: basingstoke
|
|
bertt wrote: |
meady wrote: |
Dave wrote: |
A 1.4 8v can do just over 110mph, not 95 lol Or is that not the point? |
that is s**t really because my old p reg 1.1 saxo could do 115 and that was backed up by sat nav |
i'd go with that mate had ton out of my 1.1 206 and its not meant to do bob on slightly below but again read 100 on the satnav also. . .I don't think that is the point in the argument though as cant see someone spitting their dummy out over something so small. |
what is th point in the argument by the way???
| | |
|
|
|
| | |
| PAST -2008 Vauxhall Astra VXR / 2002 pug 206 GTI
PRESENT - VW Golf GTI Semi - Auto
Now have my 106 GTI track car
TEAM - I HATE FACEBOOK | |
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 30, 2010 1:25 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 07, 2010 Posts: 902
Trade Rating: +5
Location: chester
|
|
haha mate no idea! just proper funny watching it go off :L
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 30, 2010 1:46 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 22, 2010 Posts: 133
Trade Rating: 0
Location: wales
|
|
Danny224 wrote: |
Dillon wrote: |
Danny224 wrote: |
ali20six wrote: |
Danny224 wrote: |
Ive had my 1.4 at 95MPH on teh Clock but says 90MPH on my TomTom Satnav. This is on private roads mind you | and your point is? |
My Point is. People are saying that 1.4 will do about 80... Soo How accurate or peoples opinions?
Is that ok with you?
TBH mate Your post was pointless. |
Your second post in this thread and I am still lost, you here just to spit your dummy out? |
No maybe i didnt make myself clear, never been the best at explaining things.
So here it goes...
Someone posted you cant trust what people say because they will be bias and not post true results. Then someone posted Saying his old 1.4 did about 80.... I then posted saying i have had my 1.4 upto 95 On the Clock or 90 on the TomTom Which is probably more accurate..
What i forgot to do was quote the post saying i had my 1.4 to about 80...
So my point is You cant trust what anyone says just try and see what you get(Legally)
Still dont make sense? Then forget it. | forgotten before i finished reading mate seriously,could you clarify?
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 30, 2010 2:42 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 07, 2010 Posts: 4455
Trade Rating: +1
Location: Essex
|
|
meady wrote: |
my old p reg 1.1 saxo could do 115 and that was backed up by sat nav |
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 30, 2010 2:45 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 21, 2010 Posts: 3945
Trade Rating: +45
Location: basingstoke
|
|
E5GDM wrote: |
meady wrote: |
my old p reg 1.1 saxo could do 115 and that was backed up by sat nav |
|
that saxo and my gti138 are the only cars i no that have gone off the clock,
that saxo was a rocket for a standerd 1.1 it would beat 1.1 and 1.4 206's corsa's polo's, was well good
| | |
|
|
|
| | |
| PAST -2008 Vauxhall Astra VXR / 2002 pug 206 GTI
PRESENT - VW Golf GTI Semi - Auto
Now have my 106 GTI track car
TEAM - I HATE FACEBOOK | |
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 30, 2010 2:47 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 22, 2010 Posts: 133
Trade Rating: 0
Location: wales
|
|
mmmm ok mate
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 30, 2010 2:48 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 08, 2010 Posts: 5113
Trade Rating: +7
Location: The car in front
|
|
My 1.1 saxo was a bag of s**t. It could beat snails....just.
My 1.1 pug on the other hand, is a fast b*****d. 100 is do-able without straining the engine....not that I would know, obviously....
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 30, 2010 2:50 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 21, 2010 Posts: 3945
Trade Rating: +45
Location: basingstoke
|
|
ali20six wrote: |
mmmm ok mate |
don't give a toss what ya think mate, i no it could do it and why am i guna lie bout it???
| | |
|
|
|
| | |
| PAST -2008 Vauxhall Astra VXR / 2002 pug 206 GTI
PRESENT - VW Golf GTI Semi - Auto
Now have my 106 GTI track car
TEAM - I HATE FACEBOOK | |
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 30, 2010 2:58 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 22, 2010 Posts: 133
Trade Rating: 0
Location: wales
|
|
working yourself up about nothing mate,i only said mmmm...
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 30, 2010 2:59 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 08, 2010 Posts: 5113
Trade Rating: +7
Location: The car in front
|
|
Locked, as the original question has been answered to the best of everyone's abilities.
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|