Author
|
Message |
|
Posted: Sat Oct 02, 2010 9:38 am |
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 20, 2010 Posts: 603
Trade Rating: +1
Location: Oxford
|
|
Hi guys, had my car Dyno'd today @ Talk of The Devil in Uxbridge.
BHP came out at 163 and Torque came out at 140lbs/ft
Was wondering if this normal for a 180?
I've got a Pipercross Viper Induction and Scorpion Exhaust. All the fuel ratio reading are fine and the car is running fine.
Gotta admit was gutted as was expecting alot better from it. Dyno was reading correctly.
| | |
|
|
|
Last edited by Gems on Sat Oct 02, 2010 11:00 am; edited 1 time in total
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 02, 2010 9:43 am |
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 07, 2010 Posts: 3948
Trade Rating: +7
Location: A Track near you ;)
|
|
Aye, all 180's get around the 160-170 BHP mark im afraid
| | |
|
|
|
| | |
| Renault Clio III RS - Race Car
Renault Trafic - Daily & Tow Van
Former Poverty 206 XS 1.6Turbo Owner | |
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 02, 2010 9:49 am |
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 07, 2010 Posts: 7209
Trade Rating: +14
Location: Stevenage
|
|
Mattie® wrote: |
Aye, all 180's get around the 160-170 BHP mark im afraid |
True what Mattie said. Wouldnt be to hard to get a bit more power out of it tho just depends on how much you want to spend
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 02, 2010 10:05 am |
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 07, 2010 Posts: 1261
Trade Rating: 0
Location: Leeds
|
|
yerah its normal, tarmac terriorist on here has one with 180 but thats with hours remapping it at rs tuning lol most pull that figure, most are towards the high end of 160
| | |
|
|
|
| | |
| Signature removed due to size | |
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 02, 2010 10:28 am |
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 07, 2010 Posts: 4455
Trade Rating: +1
Location: Essex
|
|
If that's 163bhp at the wheels, that's pretty good. That would be near enough 180 @ the flywheel, the figure pug quoted & named the car after.
| | |
|
|
|
Last edited by E5GDM on Sat Oct 02, 2010 10:31 am; edited 1 time in total
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 02, 2010 10:30 am |
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 20, 2010 Posts: 603
Trade Rating: +1
Location: Oxford
|
|
Its 163bhp at the flywheel. Thanks for the replies feel better now lol
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 02, 2010 10:38 am |
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 18, 2010 Posts: 4013
Trade Rating: +25
Location: Worcester
|
|
If it was 140nm torque it is 103.26lb.ft - that's one very sick puppy
If it was 140lb.ft, it is pretty low for a 180
EDIT: my figures (12/9/09) are 167.4bhp/153lb.ft (Viper & Janspeed)
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 02, 2010 12:19 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 08, 2010 Posts: 901
Trade Rating: +1
Location: Istanbul / Turkey
|
|
Check you VVT selenoid. If it fail you can never seen any CEL or diagnostic information.
| | |
|
|
|
| | |
| 2005 206 RC RED
Bilstein B14 Coilover / Brembo 4 Pot Front 330x28 - Rear 325x8 / Quaife ATB Limited Slip Diff / Janspeed Catback
Lot's of CNC machined customs pars. | |
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 02, 2010 12:26 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 07, 2010 Posts: 2874
Trade Rating: +4
Location: Chichester, Sussex
|
|
Mine put out 169.9 with a Pipercross induction kit on it. I've not had it done with the Janspeed on it though.
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 02, 2010 1:15 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 10, 2010 Posts: 4014
Trade Rating: +2
|
|
If it helps the clio's are the same, i think a few VW's are the same aswel. For some reason they just dont make the power and pug took it upon them selfs to lie about the output.
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 02, 2010 1:25 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 18, 2010 Posts: 4013
Trade Rating: +25
Location: Worcester
|
|
Big_Rich180 wrote: |
If it helps the clio's are the same, i think a few VW's are the same aswel. For some reason they just dont make the power and pug took it upon them selfs to lie about the output. |
VW 'usually' underquote their figures.
This year's RSTuning saw my Golf TSI at 160.4bhp/180lb.ft at 1000 miles (VW figures 160bhp/177lb.ft). Most of the other cars were under-performing due to the hot weather
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 03, 2010 1:20 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 07, 2010 Posts: 1261
Trade Rating: 0
Location: Leeds
|
|
why do they need to lie, they did'not with the original gti
| | |
|
|
|
| | |
| Signature removed due to size | |
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 03, 2010 1:23 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 07, 2010 Posts: 1312
Trade Rating: 0
Location: Aberdeen, Scotland
|
|
no_offences wrote: |
why do they need to lie, they did'not with the original gti |
Think it was to compete with the Clio 172/182 that it was targeting.
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 03, 2010 1:24 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 23, 2010 Posts: 655
Trade Rating: +1
Location: North West
|
|
180's come out the factory with 177ps, which is 173bhp standard?! roughly? so not far off..
Your torque seems a bit low..
mine standard was 161.6 bhp and 147 torque, then with new filter and exhaust was 169,2bhp and 154 torques.
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 03, 2010 2:25 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 25, 2010 Posts: 222
Trade Rating: 0
Location: leeds
|
|
chances are that your car will be less power than standard if it has the pipercross and the scorpion exhaust. everybody puts them on as they think it gains you power when nine times out of ten you actally lose power. the extra noise makes you think its quicker lol. most induction kits are fitted incorrectly causing warm air to be sucked into the engine therfore resulting in loss of power, ( if they were that good wouldnt all car manufacturers fit them to hot hatches as standard if its such a cheap easy way to gain bhp) and the exhausts normally cause you to loose back pressure again resulting in power loss. my friend has a megane f1 230, had it on the rolling road, then fitted a K & N induction kit and rolling roaded it again the same day and the loss was incredible, 13bhp iirc. you notice more difference by running your car on higher octane fuel and keeping your tyre pressures correct than changing an air filter or exhaust.
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|