Author
|
Message |
|
Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2012 8:17 am |
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 20, 2012 Posts: 269
Trade Rating: 0
|
|
Which one would u pick
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2012 8:18 am |
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 07, 2010 Posts: 5120
Trade Rating: +19
Location: Raunds, Northamptonshire
|
|
why would you pick 140 over 180 unless it was because you simply couldn't afford it
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2012 8:54 am |
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 27, 2011 Posts: 1588
Trade Rating: +15
Location: West Midlands
|
|
The 180 is a lot better equipped than the 140. So 180 is a clear winner. Unless you wanted to do a lot of engine work then I'd recommend the 140
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2012 9:04 am |
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 07, 2010 Posts: 1493
Trade Rating: +8
|
|
Well that's a stupid question if there ever was one...
I would go for the 40 bhp less model loosing out on the suspension revisions and a few less luxuries... because it's got more tuning potential to get it up to 180 stock figures ^^.
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2012 9:21 am |
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 10, 2010 Posts: 4014
Trade Rating: +2
|
|
JamieM wrote: |
Well that's a stupid question if there ever was one...
I would go for the 40 bhp less model loosing out on the suspension revisions and a few less luxuries... because it's got more tuning potential to get it up to 180 stock figures ^^. |
20bhp less
But yeah, stupid question really.
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2012 9:28 am |
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 20, 2012 Posts: 269
Trade Rating: 0
|
|
Ye the 180 does 140 mph and the 140 does 130 mph so for 10 mph diff it not that much it was only a poll anyway
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2012 9:32 am |
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 29, 2011 Posts: 6526
Trade Rating: +10
Location: Westhoughton, Lancashire
|
|
why isn't there a "Niether, buy a decent car" option?
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2012 9:41 am |
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 27, 2011 Posts: 1588
Trade Rating: +15
Location: West Midlands
|
|
macca1411 wrote: |
why isn't there a "Niether, buy a decent car" option? |
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2012 9:56 am |
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 07, 2010 Posts: 1493
Trade Rating: +8
|
|
Big_Rich180 wrote: |
JamieM wrote: |
Well that's a stupid question if there ever was one...
I would go for the 40 bhp less model loosing out on the suspension revisions and a few less luxuries... because it's got more tuning potential to get it up to 180 stock figures ^^. |
20bhp less
But yeah, stupid question really. |
Assuming all 138's make their stock figures
20 bhp is still 20 bhp haha
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2012 10:01 am |
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 08, 2010 Posts: 3262
Trade Rating: +18
Location: Plymouth
|
|
Definitely recommend the 180 over the 140, i've just upgraded from the 140 to the 180 and it is far superior than the 140 and I seriously don't regret buying the 180
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2012 10:10 am |
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 08, 2010 Posts: 2194
Trade Rating: +2
Location: Bristol & Leicester
|
|
Deano wrote: |
Ye the 180 does 140 mph and the 140 does 130 mph so for 10 mph diff it not that much it was only a poll anyway |
Good God, I hope you're not comparing cars based on their top speed?
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2012 10:11 am |
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 08, 2010 Posts: 7045
Trade Rating: +5
Location: In the garage
|
|
I've only got a 138. I must be a peasant. The 180 wasn't out when I got mine.
This was more true when the cars were newer but if you planned serious modification work then it didnt make sense to pay a premium for a newer 180 when all the changes that made the 180 different to the 138 would be put in the bin.
| | |
|
|
|
| | |
| 2001 GTi 138, Bilstein Sprint dampers, H&R springs, 21mm Peugeot Sport torsion bars, 22mm rear ARB, Peugeot Sport Group A wishbones, 283mm discs, Goodridge stainless hoses, Maniflow 304 grade 4-2-1 2.5" manifold and system, 200 cell cat, Richard Longman head, 45mm Jenvey throttle bodies, 9.5mm TB spacers, 90mm air horns, Jenvey throttle linkage, Jenvey fuel rail, Aeromotive and Goodridge fuel fittings and braided hose, ITG sausage filter, Radtec custom radiator, Piper Ultimate Road cams, Piper vernier pulleys, Omex 600 ECU. Saxo electric PAS pump, Vibra Technics engine mounts. Samco coolant hoses, TTV steel flywheel, 4.76 final drive ratio, 307 CC 180 ratios. 2019 BMW 530i. 2017 Mercedes C300 convertible. | |
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2012 10:23 am |
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 10, 2010 Posts: 4014
Trade Rating: +2
|
|
Edward wrote: |
I've only got a 138. I must be a peasant. The 180 wasn't out when I got mine.
This was more true when the cars were newer but if you planned serious modification work then it didnt make sense to pay a premium for a newer 180 when all the changes that made the 180 different to the 138 would be put in the bin. |
What this ^ peasant said
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2012 10:40 am |
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 21, 2012 Posts: 2277
Trade Rating: +16
Location: west midlands
|
|
2.0 hdi
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2012 10:41 am |
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 27, 2010 Posts: 11520
Trade Rating: +10
Location: What's it to you? ? ?
|
|
If I had to choose between those 2 it would be the later 138 GTI with standard ESP.
| | |
|
|
|
| | |
| Toyota C-HR GR Sport 2.0 Hybrid with JBL & Alcantara packs. | |
| | |
|
|
|
|
|