#16: Re: B16A engine on 206, what do u guys think Author: heyziq, Location: MalaysiaPosted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 2:34 pm ---- only honda can have such this powerful engine back days...but fuel consumption :c
#17: Re: B16A engine on 206, what do u guys think Author: Teebag, Location: exhall, bedworth, coventryPosted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 4:13 pm ----
Guyrichie wrote:
The dudes in Denmark was a b16a not a b
And well bcos a 180 is running what 160 max a b16b is about 185
A standard ek9 will beat a standard 180 all day long
my mistake..... DO IT THEN!!!!!
#18: Re: B16A engine on 206, what do u guys think Author: no_offences, Location: LeedsPosted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 4:27 pm ---- if the engine you guys are on about is from a type r it would rape a 180 if it was in a 206, my mate has a type r and it p**ses on my gt and the civic is alot heavier too so it wouldnt even be a contest
#19: Re: B16A engine on 206, what do u guys think Author: no_offences, Location: LeedsPosted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 4:27 pm ---- plus 180s have like 160 civics are 200
#20: Re: B16A engine on 206, what do u guys think Author: Seabook, Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 4:46 pm ----
no_offences wrote:
if the engine you guys are on about is from a type r it would rape a 180 if it was in a 206, my mate has a type r and it p**ses on my gt and the civic is alot heavier too so it wouldnt even be a contest
depends on which civic are you looking at.
EK9 definitely weight less than a 206 and could easily cut the weight below 1 ton. New civic are just big fat chick.....
#21: Re: B16A engine on 206, what do u guys think Author: Guyrichie, Location: Workington, CumbriaPosted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 5:11 pm ---- Yeah we talkin 6th gen ek shape back when honda made decent engines the ek9 type rs are 185 bhp b16b engine
#22: Re: B16A engine on 206, what do u guys think Author: Iain, Location: Aberdeen, ScotlandPosted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 5:16 pm ----
no_offences wrote:
if the engine you guys are on about is from a type r it would rape a 180 if it was in a 206, my mate has a type r and it p**ses on my gt and the civic is alot heavier too so it wouldnt even be a contest
Nah that's the EP3 Civic, they're talkin about the EK9 I think
#23: Re: B16A engine on 206, what do u guys think Author: no_offences, Location: LeedsPosted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 5:17 pm ---- well im on about a 2003 type r the best one, its deffo heavy then my 206 in my opinion its longer, chunkier feels better built more solid, but it could be lighter i have no figures but from looks and feel id say the civic is heavy the old golf is much heavy then the 206 and thats the same size, anyway that engine has 200bhp and is a millioon times better then a 180 engine
#24: Re: B16A engine on 206, what do u guys think Author: Guyrichie, Location: Workington, CumbriaPosted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 5:24 pm ---- no mate thats a k-series engine a k20 yeah a 2003 ep3 will be heaver
no we are on about the b-series engines much better imo
and if you think the ep civics are good you should really try s ek9 so so much better lighter better handling and most probly faster ???
#25: Re: B16A engine on 206, what do u guys think Author: no_offences, Location: LeedsPosted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 5:28 pm ---- dunno i just have an obsession for them after mate give me a drive, gettin to the high revs throws tyou back iin your seat, i was gunna get the special edition one with the red recaros but like a t**t i forgot id get insurance raped so i kept with 206 for time being, ill always keep the gt even when i finally get my civic
#26: Re: B16A engine on 206, what do u guys think Author: Guyrichie, Location: Workington, CumbriaPosted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 5:31 pm ---- yeah the ep3 are amazing cars but really you should try a ek9 ull be even more impressed
#27: Re: B16A engine on 206, what do u guys think Author: Jamie, Location: Ring y0Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 5:36 pm ---- V Tack is nothing special, it's a good idea in theory but have fun finding your torque.
I've been in Type R's and wasn't impressed. The 180 is a better car (and I'm not even fond of them any more!).
Quoting peak BHP is pointless when you don't go near it until 7k RPM...
#28: Re: B16A engine on 206, what do u guys think Author: Seabook, Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 6:34 pm ----
Jamie wrote:
V Tack is nothing special, it's a good idea in theory but have fun finding your torque.
I've been in Type R's and wasn't impressed. The 180 is a better car (and I'm not even fond of them any more!).
Quoting peak BHP is pointless when you don't go near it until 7k RPM...
it downs to what is the main usage of the car, trackdat ftw!
#29: Re: B16A engine on 206, what do u guys think Author: Howey, Location: Kings LynnPosted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 6:37 pm ---- All conjecture and Blether... Pub ammo at best
#30: Re: B16A engine on 206, what do u guys think Author: no_offences, Location: LeedsPosted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 7:41 pm ---- i love 180s and i love type rs, i just love the idea of that engine in a smaller car, its different too.
We are not responsible for comments posted by our users, as they are the property of the poster
Interactive software released under GNU GPL,
Code Credits,
Privacy Policy
Membership:
Latest: 
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 17130
Online Now [371]:
Visitors: 370
Members: 0
Staff Online Now:
Page Views:
General
