#1: angel eyes.... the truth Author: micka, Location: leicestershirePosted: Sat Mar 19, 2011 4:17 pm ---- Many people are selling angel eyes after having them fitted to their cars, they are going back to standard, why is this?
Is the visibility at night really that poor, can't you put h7 100w bulbs in them, or quite frankly are the standard headlamp units better?
What's your opinions, especially those of you that own angel eye headlamps the truth please....
Thank you for your honesty
Micka
#2: Re: angel eyes.... the truth Author: 2Oh!6, Location: GloucesterPosted: Sat Mar 19, 2011 4:19 pm ---- They're crap for output and are very overdone in the car world now.
#3: Re: angel eyes.... the truth Author: Gems, Location: OxfordPosted: Sat Mar 19, 2011 4:20 pm ---- imho they look cheap and tacky, there really bad for night time driving. Alot of the kits are cheap as they are cheaply made and poor fitting so when people think they are getting a bargain they really aren't and end up changing back.
#4: Re: angel eyes.... the truth Author: NorthantsBen, Location: Raunds, NorthamptonshirePosted: Sat Mar 19, 2011 4:23 pm ---- i had angle eyes, alot of people say the light output is poor, but i found it better than the crystal (have heard few other people say that too )
if it was the type/make of them i dont know
#5: Re: angel eyes.... the truth Author: JordGJ, Location: Leeds / West MidlandsPosted: Sat Mar 19, 2011 4:29 pm ---- because they are tacky and overdone and every other chav has them on there saxo's and corsa's
i think it was a phase, and people are realising now
#6: Re: angel eyes.... the truth Author: Seabook, Posted: Sat Mar 19, 2011 4:36 pm ---- so or later morrette will have the same fate as angel lol
#7: Re: angel eyes.... the truth Author: DJ-, Location: UKPosted: Sat Mar 19, 2011 4:38 pm ---- no way morettes are top market stuff
#8: Re: angel eyes.... the truth Author: bolly92, Location: LongridgePosted: Sat Mar 19, 2011 4:39 pm ---- i personally think light output is better, but that might just be me, and also, the onlyy reason why i bought them was so i could have projectors on my car.
#9: Re: angel eyes.... the truth Author: meady, Location: basingstokePosted: Sat Mar 19, 2011 5:41 pm ---- I found thm crao for light output when i had mine compared to standerd. I also found tht they didnt fit very well as there was a gap between the lights and the bonnet
#10: Re: angel eyes.... the truth Author: XSIcheeseman, Location: OrpingtonPosted: Sat Mar 19, 2011 6:19 pm ---- haha wow dont make me feel better as i just bought some lol
#11: Re: angel eyes.... the truth Author: Jammo, Location: BrightonPosted: Sat Mar 19, 2011 6:27 pm ---- Light output is alot better imo!
#12: Re: angel eyes.... the truth Author: no_offences, Location: LeedsPosted: Sat Mar 19, 2011 6:33 pm ---- lets set it straight i had crystals on my gti i swapped for angels, did i think the light output was poor? no, cheap s**t ones maybe but i had ones made by ultra and they were pretty good, i now have morettes which are worse then both, and they are overdone to be honest but i upgraded because i got morettes cheap otherwise i was happy with them
#13: Re: angel eyes.... the truth Author: no_offences, Location: LeedsPosted: Sat Mar 19, 2011 6:34 pm ----
DJ- wrote:
no way morettes are top market stuff
sorry but my angels where better then morettes for output
#14: Re: angel eyes.... the truth Author: no_offences, Location: LeedsPosted: Sat Mar 19, 2011 6:35 pm ----
NorthantsBen wrote:
i had angle eyes, alot of people say the light output is poor, but i found it better than the crystal (have heard few other people say that too )
if it was the type/make of them i dont know
i agree, ive owned all 206 lights apart from the r8 ones and i found morettes to be the worst by a long way
#15: Re: angel eyes.... the truth Author: no_offences, Location: LeedsPosted: Sat Mar 19, 2011 6:38 pm ----
meady wrote:
I found thm crao for light output when i had mine compared to standerd. I also found tht they didnt fit very well as there was a gap between the lights and the bonnet
fitment is deffo an issue they never fit right mine were on 3 different 206s and the drivers never fit right on any
#16: Re: angel eyes.... the truth Author: DJ-, Location: UKPosted: Sat Mar 19, 2011 6:39 pm ----
no_offences wrote:
DJ- wrote:
no way morettes are top market stuff
sorry but my angels where better then morettes for output
I didnt say morettes were better? I meant they arent chavy
and my morettes output with philips xtreme are great. Not sure why people have issues. Guessing bad alignment or something
#17: Re: angel eyes.... the truth Author: myke, Location: United KingdomPosted: Sat Mar 19, 2011 6:52 pm ---- my phase 1s are just fine with osrams lol, although angel eyes are/were different i quite like them!
#18: Re: angel eyes.... the truth Author: Seabook, Posted: Sat Mar 19, 2011 7:29 pm ----
DJ- wrote:
no_offences wrote:
DJ- wrote:
no way morettes are top market stuff
sorry but my angels where better then morettes for output
I didnt say morettes were better? I meant they arent chavy
and my morettes output with philips xtreme are great. Not sure why people have issues. Guessing bad alignment or something
that's because they don't eat carrot
#19: Re: angel eyes.... the truth Author: Aar_Im_A_Pirate, Location: Northern IrelandPosted: Sat Mar 19, 2011 7:38 pm ---- Iv just installed angels with 90% brighter bulbs and I'm very happy with the light output
We are not responsible for comments posted by our users, as they are the property of the poster
Interactive software released under GNU GPL,
Code Credits,
Privacy Policy
Membership:
Latest: 
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 17129
Online Now [125]:
Visitors: 124
Members: 0
Staff Online Now:
Page Views:
General
i quite like them!
