#1: Random Question Author: Swardy, Location: CambridgePosted: Wed Jul 13, 2011 1:46 am ---- Does anybody know how much a 16" Nimrod with a tyre weighs?!
Random I know! Maybe if someone has sent one they may know it's weight....
cheers!
#2: Re: Random Question Author: Seabook, Posted: Wed Jul 13, 2011 1:48 am ---- you are looking at 15-17kg per corner
#3: Re: Random Question Author: Swardy, Location: CambridgePosted: Wed Jul 13, 2011 1:49 am ----
Seabook wrote:
you are looking at 15-17kg per corner
Awesome, cheers dude! Quick response too! you gotta love 206info!
#4: Re: Random Question Author: JE_180, Location: WiltshirePosted: Wed Jul 13, 2011 1:51 am ---- Vortexes weigh 16kg per corner including a tyre so slightly less like Seabook said, 15kg ish.
#5: Re: Random Question Author: Swardy, Location: CambridgePosted: Wed Jul 13, 2011 1:56 am ----
JE_180 wrote:
Vortexes weigh 16kg per corner including a tyre so slightly less like Seabook said, 15kg ish.
ok, cool. cheers man.
#6: Re: Random Question Author: Big_Rich180, Posted: Wed Jul 13, 2011 1:57 am ----
JE_180 wrote:
Vortexes weigh 16kg per corner including a tyre so slightly less like Seabook said, 15kg ish.
One thing, Vortex's weigh less than Nimrods
#7: Re: Random Question Author: Swardy, Location: CambridgePosted: Wed Jul 13, 2011 1:59 am ---- I'll work on the assumption that it's 17kg
#8: Re: Random Question Author: JE_180, Location: WiltshirePosted: Wed Jul 13, 2011 2:00 am ----
Big_Rich180 wrote:
JE_180 wrote:
Vortexes weigh 16kg per corner including a tyre so slightly less like Seabook said, 15kg ish.
One thing, Vortex's weigh less than Nimrods
You're kidding? Vortexes weigh a f*****g ton for their size lol
#9: Re: Random Question Author: Big_Rich180, Posted: Wed Jul 13, 2011 2:02 am ----
JE_180 wrote:
Big_Rich180 wrote:
JE_180 wrote:
Vortexes weigh 16kg per corner including a tyre so slightly less like Seabook said, 15kg ish.
One thing, Vortex's weigh less than Nimrods
You're kidding? Vortexes weigh a f*****g ton for their size lol
I thought that they would be heavier but when i got a Vortex in one hand and a Nimrod in the other the vortex's are quite a bit lighter.
#10: Re: Random Question Author: Swardy, Location: CambridgePosted: Wed Jul 13, 2011 2:08 am ----
Big_Rich180 wrote:
JE_180 wrote:
Big_Rich180 wrote:
JE_180 wrote:
Vortexes weigh 16kg per corner including a tyre so slightly less like Seabook said, 15kg ish.
One thing, Vortex's weigh less than Nimrods
You're kidding? Vortexes weigh a f*****g ton for their size lol
I thought that they would be heavier but when i got a Vortex in one hand and a Nimrod in the other the vortex's are quite a bit lighter.
Sure you're not just stronger in one arm mate?
#11: Re: Random Question Author: Big_Rich180, Posted: Wed Jul 13, 2011 2:09 am ----
Swardy wrote:
Big_Rich180 wrote:
JE_180 wrote:
Big_Rich180 wrote:
JE_180 wrote:
Vortexes weigh 16kg per corner including a tyre so slightly less like Seabook said, 15kg ish.
One thing, Vortex's weigh less than Nimrods
You're kidding? Vortexes weigh a f*****g ton for their size lol
I thought that they would be heavier but when i got a Vortex in one hand and a Nimrod in the other the vortex's are quite a bit lighter.
Sure you're not just stronger in one arm mate?
Well i do w**k alot
But no, I have lifted enough things in my liftime to know when something is heavier than another
#12: Re: Random Question Author: JE_180, Location: WiltshirePosted: Wed Jul 13, 2011 2:11 am ----
#13: Re: Random Question Author: Big_Rich180, Posted: Wed Jul 13, 2011 2:11 am ----
#14: Re: Random Question Author: JE_180, Location: WiltshirePosted: Wed Jul 13, 2011 2:16 am ---- Been watchin me some of that internet p0rn....
#15: Re: Random Question Author: Swardy, Location: CambridgePosted: Wed Jul 13, 2011 2:17 am ----
JE_180 wrote:
#16: Re: Random Question Author: Big_Rich180, Posted: Wed Jul 13, 2011 2:17 am ----
JE_180 wrote:
Been watchin me some of that internet p0rn....
You've been watching pron at this time in the morning
Thats dedication for you!
#17: Re: Random Question Author: JE_180, Location: WiltshirePosted: Wed Jul 13, 2011 2:19 am ---- gota pass the time at work
#18: Re: Random Question Author: Seb, Location: Under your bedPosted: Wed Jul 13, 2011 2:33 am ---- They must have had tyres on because nimrods definatetly weigh less. If they don't then the research I did a few years ago was wrong.
#19: Re: Random Question Author: Big_Rich180, Posted: Wed Jul 13, 2011 2:35 am ----
Seb wrote:
They must have had tyres on because nimrods definatetly weigh less. If they don't then the research I did a few years ago was wrong.
They both had tyres on...cant be arsed to argue this case.
#20: Re: Random Question Author: JE_180, Location: WiltshirePosted: Wed Jul 13, 2011 2:37 am ----
Big_Rich180 wrote:
Seb wrote:
They must have had tyres on because nimrods definatetly weigh less. If they don't then the research I did a few years ago was wrong.
They both had tyres on...cant be arsed to argue this case.
Why not? FIIIIIIIGGGGGHHHHHHTTTT!!!!
#21: Re: Random Question Author: Big_Rich180, Posted: Wed Jul 13, 2011 2:38 am ----
JE_180 wrote:
Big_Rich180 wrote:
Seb wrote:
They must have had tyres on because nimrods definatetly weigh less. If they don't then the research I did a few years ago was wrong.
They both had tyres on...cant be arsed to argue this case.
Why not? FIIIIIIIGGGGGHHHHHHTTTT!!!!
Because someone always disagrees and I just cant be arsed anymore....well...for now
#22: Re: Random Question Author: JE_180, Location: WiltshirePosted: Wed Jul 13, 2011 2:40 am ----
Big_Rich180 wrote:
JE_180 wrote:
Big_Rich180 wrote:
Seb wrote:
They must have had tyres on because nimrods definatetly weigh less. If they don't then the research I did a few years ago was wrong.
They both had tyres on...cant be arsed to argue this case.
Why not? FIIIIIIIGGGGGHHHHHHTTTT!!!!
Because someone always disagrees and I just cant be arsed anymore....well...for now
Give it an hour then
#23: Re: Random Question Author: Seb, Location: Under your bedPosted: Wed Jul 13, 2011 2:46 am ---- Well, I didn't take weeks going through the OEM wheels weight checking for no reason. So as I said, unless my information was given to me false, the Nimrods were what I ended up with, because they were lighter.
#24: Re: Random Question Author: E5GDM, Location: EssexPosted: Wed Jul 13, 2011 3:25 am ---- Big_Rich180, when was the last time your arms were recalibrated? lol.
#25: Re: Random Question Author: Jordan_xsi, Location: IpswichPosted: Wed Jul 13, 2011 3:39 am ----
E5GDM wrote:
Big_Rich180, when was the last time your arms were recalibrated? lol.
#26: Re: Random Question Author: Big_Rich180, Posted: Wed Jul 13, 2011 3:48 am ----
E5GDM wrote:
Big_Rich180, when was the last time your arms were recalibrated? lol.
#27: Re: Random Question Author: pug-206-boy, Location: Eastbourne, East SussexPosted: Wed Feb 22, 2012 8:28 pm ---- Didn't know quagmire was left handed...
#28: Re: Random Question Author: Steve180, Location: CoventryPosted: Thu Feb 23, 2012 3:29 am ---- Just to clear this up. The true 206 GTi 180 alloys (non centre capped) are 2.4 KGs lighter than the standrad GTi alloys.
GTi alloys: with tyres 17.13KGs
GTi 180 alloys: with tyres 15.008kgs
Just checked this on our weight machine at work and confirmed it with the O/E spec on Servicebox.
We are not responsible for comments posted by our users, as they are the property of the poster
Interactive software released under GNU GPL,
Code Credits,
Privacy Policy
Membership:
Latest: 
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 17129
Online Now [389]:
Visitors: 388
Members: 0
Staff Online Now:
Page Views:
General
