#16: Re: Random Question Author: Big_Rich180, Posted: Wed Jul 13, 2011 2:17 am ----
JE_180 wrote:
Been watchin me some of that internet p0rn....
You've been watching pron at this time in the morning
Thats dedication for you!
#17: Re: Random Question Author: JE_180, Location: WiltshirePosted: Wed Jul 13, 2011 2:19 am ---- gota pass the time at work
#18: Re: Random Question Author: Seb, Location: Under your bedPosted: Wed Jul 13, 2011 2:33 am ---- They must have had tyres on because nimrods definatetly weigh less. If they don't then the research I did a few years ago was wrong.
#19: Re: Random Question Author: Big_Rich180, Posted: Wed Jul 13, 2011 2:35 am ----
Seb wrote:
They must have had tyres on because nimrods definatetly weigh less. If they don't then the research I did a few years ago was wrong.
They both had tyres on...cant be arsed to argue this case.
#20: Re: Random Question Author: JE_180, Location: WiltshirePosted: Wed Jul 13, 2011 2:37 am ----
Big_Rich180 wrote:
Seb wrote:
They must have had tyres on because nimrods definatetly weigh less. If they don't then the research I did a few years ago was wrong.
They both had tyres on...cant be arsed to argue this case.
Why not? FIIIIIIIGGGGGHHHHHHTTTT!!!!
#21: Re: Random Question Author: Big_Rich180, Posted: Wed Jul 13, 2011 2:38 am ----
JE_180 wrote:
Big_Rich180 wrote:
Seb wrote:
They must have had tyres on because nimrods definatetly weigh less. If they don't then the research I did a few years ago was wrong.
They both had tyres on...cant be arsed to argue this case.
Why not? FIIIIIIIGGGGGHHHHHHTTTT!!!!
Because someone always disagrees and I just cant be arsed anymore....well...for now
#22: Re: Random Question Author: JE_180, Location: WiltshirePosted: Wed Jul 13, 2011 2:40 am ----
Big_Rich180 wrote:
JE_180 wrote:
Big_Rich180 wrote:
Seb wrote:
They must have had tyres on because nimrods definatetly weigh less. If they don't then the research I did a few years ago was wrong.
They both had tyres on...cant be arsed to argue this case.
Why not? FIIIIIIIGGGGGHHHHHHTTTT!!!!
Because someone always disagrees and I just cant be arsed anymore....well...for now
Give it an hour then
#23: Re: Random Question Author: Seb, Location: Under your bedPosted: Wed Jul 13, 2011 2:46 am ---- Well, I didn't take weeks going through the OEM wheels weight checking for no reason. So as I said, unless my information was given to me false, the Nimrods were what I ended up with, because they were lighter.
#24: Re: Random Question Author: E5GDM, Location: EssexPosted: Wed Jul 13, 2011 3:25 am ---- Big_Rich180, when was the last time your arms were recalibrated? lol.
#25: Re: Random Question Author: Jordan_xsi, Location: IpswichPosted: Wed Jul 13, 2011 3:39 am ----
E5GDM wrote:
Big_Rich180, when was the last time your arms were recalibrated? lol.
#26: Re: Random Question Author: Big_Rich180, Posted: Wed Jul 13, 2011 3:48 am ----
E5GDM wrote:
Big_Rich180, when was the last time your arms were recalibrated? lol.
#27: Re: Random Question Author: pug-206-boy, Location: Eastbourne, East SussexPosted: Wed Feb 22, 2012 8:28 pm ---- Didn't know quagmire was left handed...
#28: Re: Random Question Author: Steve180, Location: CoventryPosted: Thu Feb 23, 2012 3:29 am ---- Just to clear this up. The true 206 GTi 180 alloys (non centre capped) are 2.4 KGs lighter than the standrad GTi alloys.
GTi alloys: with tyres 17.13KGs
GTi 180 alloys: with tyres 15.008kgs
Just checked this on our weight machine at work and confirmed it with the O/E spec on Servicebox.
We are not responsible for comments posted by our users, as they are the property of the poster
Interactive software released under GNU GPL,
Code Credits,
Privacy Policy
Membership:
Latest: 
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 17129
Online Now [151]:
Visitors: 150
Members: 0
Staff Online Now:
Page Views:
General
