#31: Re: 206 automatic ??? Author: namgaj, Location: Chasing Ash, Addaz and Lee........... hopefully catching Addaz and havin fun :PPosted: Sat Aug 27, 2011 1:57 am ---- My mrs is the same, although she DID pass her test in a manual she wont drive them as she cant get the hang of them properly, her lessons and test were in a diesel, and she says that a manual petrol is harder to drive.
Anyhow I drive an auto silky smooth, and my Mrs now drives a clio auto, having drove it after having my jag for 2 and half years, it really isnt that bad
#32: Re: 206 automatic ??? Author: E5GDM, Location: EssexPosted: Sat Aug 27, 2011 2:56 am ---- No STANDARD 206 auto is faster than the manual version.
#33: Re: 206 automatic ??? Author: MrBSI, Location: What's it to you? ? ?Posted: Sat Aug 27, 2011 3:02 am ----
E5GDM wrote:
No STANDARD 206 auto is faster than the manual version.
Unless the recovery wagon has the speed limiter removed
#34: Re: 206 automatic ??? Author: jaypug206, Location: LondonPosted: Sat Aug 27, 2011 6:48 am ---- Anyways despite everyone saying there crap, i bet they haven't had 1.
I got a 2004 206 1.4 auto 64000 miles, i live in london thats why i choose auto, my car drive fine for the mileage, its fun 2 drive but is a bit slow picking up on speed but its only a 1.4 but my car has got the clutchless manual so when i wanna put my foot down i drive in manual without the headache of a clutch.
Just make sure when you buy one you got paperwork and service history with it.
But auto license honestly does restrict on car choice and buying an auto usually costs more then the same car in manual.
We are not responsible for comments posted by our users, as they are the property of the poster
Interactive software released under GNU GPL,
Code Credits,
Privacy Policy