New Here?
Toggle Content
   

Toggle Content User Info
Welcome

Anonymous

Nickname
Password
Register

Membership:
Latest: Puggingalong
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 17129

Online Now [177]:
Visitors: 176
Bots: 1
Members: 0
Staff Online Now:

No staff members are online!
Page Views:
Today: 66905
Total: 101761818

Toggle Content Main Menu
 General Info Goodies Search Web Stats Members
 Donations

 

Forums ›

:: Forums ›
Unusual suspension question
Go to page 1, 2  Next  :| |:
-> 206 Talk

#1: Unusual suspension question Author: Mounty, Location: United Kingdom PostPosted: Fri Sep 21, 2012 2:16 pm
    ----
Recently got a 206 GTi for using in production car trials. I need to get the suspension raised up as much as possible and will be doing the torsion bars on the rear but need to get the front higher.

Will front springs off a 1.1 or 1.4 fit the Gti? If I can fit these I'll then add some Grayston spring assisters to keep the springs stretched.

Any ideas appreciated.

#2: Re: Unusual suspension question Author: Seabook PostPosted: Fri Sep 21, 2012 2:44 pm
    ----
it will fit but why do you have to use the spring off a 1.1/1.4?

#3: Re: Unusual suspension question Author: SinfulDesignCom, Location: Ashford, Kent PostPosted: Fri Sep 21, 2012 4:10 pm
    ----
more importantly it will handle like a bag of sh*t Smile

#4: Re: Unusual suspension question Author: Mounty, Location: United Kingdom PostPosted: Fri Sep 21, 2012 4:49 pm
    ----
Handling not an issue as its very low speed skill tests. Also disconnecting the rear ARB.

Can i get away with just a spring change or would you say damper as well.?

#5: Re: Unusual suspension question Author: Seabook PostPosted: Fri Sep 21, 2012 4:56 pm
    ----
i don't understand what you want to do and why.

#6: Re: Unusual suspension question Author: djdan0123, Location: Northampton PostPosted: Fri Sep 21, 2012 5:52 pm
    ----
Confused.com more info please lol

#7: Re: Unusual suspension question Author: SinfulDesignCom, Location: Ashford, Kent PostPosted: Fri Sep 21, 2012 6:17 pm
    ----
206 GTI... poverty springs... disconnect the rear ARB...

... that's one screwed up "production" car Smile

#8: Re: Unusual suspension question Author: Edward, Location: In the garage PostPosted: Sat Sep 22, 2012 1:51 am
    ----
If it's low speed then why does it matter whether it's low or high?

Also 1.1 springs might end up lower than standard GTi springs because of the extra weight.

#9: Re: Unusual suspension question Author: Mounty, Location: United Kingdom PostPosted: Sat Sep 22, 2012 2:42 am
    ----
I understand why this seems a daft idea, but the softer springs from lower spec models create an element of 'bounce' on the front which helps to get the car over some of the humps & hills.

The white AX GT and black Saxo VTR in this clip www.youtube.com/watch?v=TNqEvJNolWE have 1.1 front springs and ARB disconnected. More travel in the rear suspension is required so disconnecting ARB helps here.

Another clip here
www.youtube.com/watch?...=endscreen

This clip shows why I need more clearance
www.youtube.com/watch?v=LlAAKR-qG3M

Not everybody's cup of tea but intend to do this over winter and then lower it during summer for tarmac autosolos.

#10: Re: Unusual suspension question Author: gaffa786, Location: 2 Places at once PostPosted: Sat Sep 22, 2012 6:29 am
    ----
 

#11: Re: Unusual suspension question Author: SinfulDesignCom, Location: Ashford, Kent PostPosted: Sat Sep 22, 2012 7:09 am
    ----
You need to think this through because if you remove the torsion bars altogether, hitting a bump at the right speed and you will smack the bump stops with the trailing arms - unless you have uprated shocks.

The front springs, I can see the logic...

...but I can't see the logic in a FWD going up a hill in the snow.

#12: Re: Unusual suspension question Author: paul_c, Location: UK PostPosted: Sat Sep 22, 2012 7:39 am
    ----
You guys don't understand, and haven't thought to Google, what "production car trials" are.

Why do you need the GTI, the 1.1 or 1.4 would probably do just as good a job?

#13: Re: Unusual suspension question Author: Edward, Location: In the garage PostPosted: Sat Sep 22, 2012 7:49 am
    ----
SinfulDesignCom wrote:
You need to think this through because if you remove the torsion bars altogether, hitting a bump at the right speed and you will smack the bump stops with the trailing arms - unless you have uprated shocks.


You cant remove torsion bars! They support the car - never mind when you hit a bump. Torsion bars also hold the traling arms onto the axle tube.

Uprated dampers dont restrict suspension travel either.

#14: Re: Unusual suspension question Author: SinfulDesignCom, Location: Ashford, Kent PostPosted: Sat Sep 22, 2012 8:23 am
    ----
I did once drive an AX GT 20 miles down the M62 with only axle and shocks... Bloody good fun. Nearly killed myself doing it, but fun nonetheless Smile

But joking aside... agreeing with Edward here. Removing the torision bars is a one-way ticket to looking a tit

#15: Re: Unusual suspension question Author: Seabook PostPosted: Sat Sep 22, 2012 8:39 am
    ----
you need longer spring with longer travel dampers....not necessarily softer spring as you will bottom out the suspension

instead of removing the rear ARB, you should remove the front one to give you more road contact as yours aren't RWD....

and you need a clutch type diff as well



-> 206 Talk


Go to page 1, 2  Next  :| |:

Page 1 of 2
 
We are not responsible for comments posted by our users, as they are the property of the poster
Interactive software released under GNU GPL, Code Credits, Privacy Policy