#16: Re: Get low on bags :) Author: Uz, Location: No Man's LandPosted: Thu Oct 18, 2012 3:16 pm ----
Mattie-RS wrote:
Seabook wrote:
anton1989 wrote:
cool
gay
sure addaz will agree with me
bags are for balls
The correct terminology is - bags are for fags.
#17: Re: Get low on bags :) Author: Mattie-RS, Location: A Track near you ;)Posted: Thu Oct 18, 2012 3:21 pm ----
Uz wrote:
Mattie-RS wrote:
Seabook wrote:
anton1989 wrote:
cool
gay
sure addaz will agree with me
bags are for balls
The correct terminology is - bags are for fags.
Static FTW
#18: Re: Get low on bags :) Author: anton1989, Location: west midlandsPosted: Thu Oct 18, 2012 3:48 pm ---- whats static drop
#19: Re: Get low on bags :) Author: Seabook, Posted: Thu Oct 18, 2012 4:27 pm ----
anton1989 wrote:
whats static drop
what you have got on the car originally.....
and of course. There is a solution for slamped coilovers to get over speed bump.
#20: Re: Get low on bags :) Author: Addaz, Location: SuffolkPosted: Thu Oct 18, 2012 4:47 pm ---- *shakes head*
I was lower on static
I just never saw the points in bags even when i used her day to day, its static or nout for me. Bags is never an option
Nice to hear about the -4 degrees mate, but is that it? Seems a bit, well, womanly. Be a man and go for more
#21: Re: Get low on bags :) Author: JamieM, Posted: Thu Oct 18, 2012 9:56 pm ---- What's the pro's of fitting bags improve handling over coilies ect? Please excuse my ignorance or is it just a style thing?
#22: Re: Get low on bags :) Author: 00budham00, Location: IpsPosted: Fri Oct 19, 2012 4:48 am ---- It purely a style preference on the bags as rims have changed with silly stretch as I want the car to sit on the rim
Static is cool but not practical for moving onto trailers or roads;(
Jordan i wanna save photos for when I get the axle on and sitting right
Most people hate bags as there soooo expensive , have to agree ridiculously priced
-4 camber is a start until I take measurements to get it how I would like ! So if so not enough ill get the oxy torch out
#23: Re: Get low on bags :) Author: Addaz, Location: SuffolkPosted: Fri Oct 19, 2012 3:56 pm ---- You bending the arms i take it? Or is this pre set to that degree?
If you bend any point on the arms it just weakens them as you are stretching the metal, food for thought bud
#24: Re: Get low on bags :) Author: Seabook, Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2012 4:35 pm ---- you can have in-car height control dampers.
bag is really outdated
#25: Re: Get low on bags :) Author: ARRAN, Location: WiltshirePosted: Fri Oct 19, 2012 4:36 pm ----
Addaz wrote:
its static or nout for me.
Sorry, but at a show when you see a static car beside a bagged car, you always appreciate the static more, simply because I see it as the bagged car isn't ACTUALLY low, because as soon as he/she leaves, its back up to standard ride height.. and the fun is in driving static I think. But fair play for doing something thats rarely done on a 206.
#26: Re: Get low on bags :) Author: Howey, Location: Kings LynnPosted: Fri Oct 19, 2012 5:32 pm ----
ARRAN wrote:
...and the fun is in driving static I think.
Its not fun...
#27: Re: Get low on bags :) Author: Mattie-RS, Location: A Track near you ;)Posted: Sat Oct 20, 2012 5:21 am ----
Howey wrote:
ARRAN wrote:
...and the fun is in driving static I think.
Its not fun...
Amen
#28: Re: Get low on bags :) Author: Addaz, Location: SuffolkPosted: Sat Oct 20, 2012 8:47 am ----
We are not responsible for comments posted by our users, as they are the property of the poster
Interactive software released under GNU GPL,
Code Credits,
Privacy Policy
Membership:
Latest: 
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 17129
Online Now [251]:
Visitors: 250
Members: 0
Staff Online Now:
Page Views:
General
bags are for balls 
and sitting right
