Author
|
Message |
|
Posted: Tue Aug 23, 2011 1:11 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 07, 2010 Posts: 1031
Trade Rating: +7
Location: UK - North
|
|
the 2.0 hdi has a much nicer gearbox to drive with and given the choice again, would be my preference of the two.
a remapped 1.4 takes it to approximately the same power as a standard 2.0, but with better MPG and all are £30 to tax.
| | |
|
|
|
| | |
| Former owner of a 1.4 HDi for six years | |
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Aug 23, 2011 1:26 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 08, 2010 Posts: 7045
Trade Rating: +5
Location: In the garage
|
|
Harty wrote: |
apparently they top out like a gti (130ish) because of the longer final drive with a good remap. |
Ha! Well that's a great reason for buying one...so a heavily tuned one with 140bhp will go as fast as a 140bhp GTi...amazing...
| | |
|
|
|
| | |
| 2001 GTi 138, Bilstein Sprint dampers, H&R springs, 21mm Peugeot Sport torsion bars, 22mm rear ARB, Peugeot Sport Group A wishbones, 283mm discs, Goodridge stainless hoses, Maniflow 304 grade 4-2-1 2.5" manifold and system, 200 cell cat, Richard Longman head, 45mm Jenvey throttle bodies, 9.5mm TB spacers, 90mm air horns, Jenvey throttle linkage, Jenvey fuel rail, Aeromotive and Goodridge fuel fittings and braided hose, ITG sausage filter, Radtec custom radiator, Piper Ultimate Road cams, Piper vernier pulleys, Omex 600 ECU. Saxo electric PAS pump, Vibra Technics engine mounts. Samco coolant hoses, TTV steel flywheel, 4.76 final drive ratio, 307 CC 180 ratios. 2019 BMW 530i. 2017 Mercedes C300 convertible. | |
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Aug 23, 2011 1:32 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 07, 2010 Posts: 2025
Trade Rating: +6
Location: Gloucester
|
|
If you go with the 2.0 (good car.. previous owner and I never had any real problems with it) make sure it's 51 plate or newer as mine was an x-reg and road tax pulls your pants down with something like £230 a year to keep it on the road.
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Aug 23, 2011 1:36 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 21, 2010 Posts: 228
Trade Rating: +4
Location: West Lothian
|
|
Well edward mines running about 125ish bhp and tops out about 120ish but takes an age to get there cant say what the eco one could do at the same power... Anyone with an intercooled hdi wanna test the top end? technically it is possible to match a gti but a heap more torque and you may die waiting on top end
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Aug 23, 2011 1:36 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 08, 2010 Posts: 7045
Trade Rating: +5
Location: In the garage
|
|
Y plate cars were based on emissions.
| | |
|
|
|
| | |
| 2001 GTi 138, Bilstein Sprint dampers, H&R springs, 21mm Peugeot Sport torsion bars, 22mm rear ARB, Peugeot Sport Group A wishbones, 283mm discs, Goodridge stainless hoses, Maniflow 304 grade 4-2-1 2.5" manifold and system, 200 cell cat, Richard Longman head, 45mm Jenvey throttle bodies, 9.5mm TB spacers, 90mm air horns, Jenvey throttle linkage, Jenvey fuel rail, Aeromotive and Goodridge fuel fittings and braided hose, ITG sausage filter, Radtec custom radiator, Piper Ultimate Road cams, Piper vernier pulleys, Omex 600 ECU. Saxo electric PAS pump, Vibra Technics engine mounts. Samco coolant hoses, TTV steel flywheel, 4.76 final drive ratio, 307 CC 180 ratios. 2019 BMW 530i. 2017 Mercedes C300 convertible. | |
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Aug 23, 2011 3:13 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 27, 2010 Posts: 11520
Trade Rating: +10
Location: What's it to you? ? ?
|
|
2.0 hdi everytime - end of thread.
I saw a non plexed 51 plate 2.0 HDI eco today having new tyres fitted at the garage, tax disc said £30 for 12 months & it did have a green I on the HDI badge on the back.
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Aug 23, 2011 3:19 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 08, 2010 Posts: 10151
Trade Rating: +12
|
|
Harty wrote: |
Well edward mines running about 125ish bhp and tops out about 120ish but takes an age to get there cant say what the eco one could do at the same power... Anyone with an intercooled hdi wanna test the top end? technically it is possible to match a gti but a heap more torque and you may die waiting on top end |
will still be slower than a gti, no doubt
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Aug 23, 2011 3:54 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 21, 2010 Posts: 228
Trade Rating: +4
Location: West Lothian
|
|
Yeah i'd agree it would be slower but same top end at lower revs and more torque... I seen a thread on tdoc a guy from holland got his hdi to 200bhp with a claimed 0-60 in around 6 seconds would be a beast i reckon.. An expensive beast at that as you need stuff like injectors from a merc, turbo from bmw etc
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Aug 23, 2011 4:31 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 07, 2010 Posts: 428
Trade Rating: 0
Location: Cheltenham
|
|
1.6 gti hdi....shame to see your going to downgrade
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 24, 2011 7:53 am |
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 27, 2010 Posts: 11520
Trade Rating: +10
Location: What's it to you? ? ?
|
|
lee206xsi wrote: |
1.6 gti hdi |
Its not April the 1st for a while
1.6 HDI, wankest engine Peugeot ever fitted to the 206, why do idiots keep buying these pieces of s**te
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 24, 2011 10:34 am |
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 21, 2010 Posts: 228
Trade Rating: +4
Location: West Lothian
|
|
MrBSI wrote: |
lee206xsi wrote: |
1.6 gti hdi |
Its not April the 1st for a while
1.6 HDI, wankest engine Peugeot ever fitted to the 206, why do idiots keep buying these pieces of s**te |
for gti looks and some powaaaa? well until the fap light
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 24, 2011 10:44 am |
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 08, 2010 Posts: 1301
Trade Rating: +4
Location: rochdale
|
|
thing is there only 110 bhp, which is only 20more than a normal hdi, a remap on a 2.0 hdi and its probably gunna be more powerful
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 24, 2011 10:47 am |
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 07, 2010 Posts: 5575
Trade Rating: +33
Location: Moscow
|
|
If you have the money for a 1.4hdi and then think ooo.. I'll remap it and it will be as powerful as the 2.0hdi... Why not just buy a 2.0 and use the remap money on the 2.0 and have even more power?
As stated. Better gearbox, £30 tax as well and bulletproof engine.. Any reason the 1.4hdi is better? Nah.
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 24, 2011 10:52 am |
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 21, 2010 Posts: 228
Trade Rating: +4
Location: West Lothian
|
|
tomd0801754 wrote: |
If you have the money for a 1.4hdi and then think ooo.. I'll remap it and it will be as powerful as the 2.0hdi... Why not just buy a 2.0 and use the remap money on the 2.0 and have even more power?
As stated. Better gearbox, £30 tax as well and bulletproof engine.. Any reason the 1.4hdi is better? Nah. |
this
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|