 |
 General Info Goodies Search Web Stats Members
 Donations
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Forums › The Car › 206 Talk › 206 turbo (280bhp) Vs Porshe 996 Turbo (500bhp) |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Author
|
Message |
|
|
 Posted: Fri Jul 05, 2013 3:50 pm |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 16, 2013
Posts: 676
Trade Rating: +1
Location: Blackburn
|
 |
Just read this post and forget all the arguing this car he has, is an absolute gem and you can hold your head high. I'm on with my build now 
| |  |
|
|
 |
 | |  |
| 1999 206 Gt... Gti180 inlet, Gti180 exhaust manifold, Gti180 injectors, Gti-6 throttle body, Custom Adapter pipe to mate the throttle body to intake, Gti180 alternator, Gti-6 ICV, Straight through stainless exhaust system, cat cams (apparently), Avo coilovers, short shift gear stick, stripped out with fixed back bucket seat and harness, flocked dash, momo steering wheel and D2 solid boss, real carbon cold air intake, Gti-6 front calipers and 288mm disks, rear drilled and grooved disks, morette headlights, sp bonnet grill 71,456 miles
2008 Audi A3 2.0 Tdi 170 | |
 | |  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jul 05, 2013 5:47 pm |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 11, 2010
Posts: 127
Trade Rating: 0
Location: Luton, Beds
|
|
Forums are jokes. 1st time I've ever witnessed someone admit that they're wrong though so fair play eddie206!!!!
Thanks for the positive comments (you know who you are)
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 06, 2013 6:20 am |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 15, 2013
Posts: 244
Trade Rating: 0
|
|
Im not one of these cranks that argues for the sake of it..it just seems so slow and its still bugging me a bit but the facts are all there on the car stats site..
Even a veyron does 0-60in 2.6 and 60-100 in2.9 closer figures but still beaten by the lower speeds..
Anyway im sure i saw clarkson on TG go mad for a merc that did the approx 60-100 in a mad fast time that may have been an exception to the rule..im thinkin it was a a very big engined cl500amg or sumthing like that...must have been a repeat from around 2008?..
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 06, 2013 6:42 am |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 13, 2012
Posts: 321
Trade Rating: +3
Location: North West
|
|
I said originally "with the exception of a very few supercars"
There are some supercars that complete the 60-100 faster. The Koenigsegg CCXR is one example.
There are others. But as a rule, 0-60 is always faster for the reasons already explained
| | |
|
|
|
|
| | |
| Own a Blue Peugeot 206 GTI 180. | |
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 06, 2013 7:31 am |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 15, 2013
Posts: 244
Trade Rating: 0
|
|
Yeah...ive got that now...ok?
Its funny that...how youve gone from"not knowing much" and "needing it explaining in dummy technology"
In just under a month youve gone from dummy not knowing much...to expert know it all..
It amazes me the rate some people learn things these days...
Thats from not understanding the basic susspension on a car to being a professor on the inner workings of momentum and the forces and friction of acceleration on a moving body.....Amazin..
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 08, 2013 3:55 pm |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 03, 2012
Posts: 96
Trade Rating: 0
Location: Doncaster
|
|
This has been a good, entertaining read
Very nice 206, can't imagine how much time and effort has been put into creating that.
1 thing i would say to eddie206, instead of thinking in terms of physics i'd just like to through my 2cents in there.
Going from 0-10mph on a pushbike will be quicker than 10-20mph cause its that much harder to do the 2nd acceleration. Exactly the same with cars.
E5GDM Is right with the physics though.
Just to explain about what Lee1985 said, the 60-100mph is only faster if the cars have a savage enough acceleration and the slingshot from the 1st 0-60mph helps to overcome drag, also depends where the engine is in its power/torque band.
Still a great read 
Regards, Richard.
| | |
|
|
|
|
| | |
| Life would be easier with universal jointed arms and fingers sometimes | |
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 09, 2013 1:12 pm |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 10, 2013
Posts: 29
Trade Rating: 0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 01, 2014 10:28 am |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 13, 2013
Posts: 91
Trade Rating: 0
|
|
LOL, as if I'm only just reading this thread now, bringing this back up (with knowledge on physics from uni, actually scrap that, basic physics from school!), the faster the car goes the more air resistance there is, 0-60 has barely any air resistance, but as said before, when the speed increases, the air resistance does too. So this the 206 GTi 180 takes what 7 seconds to get to 60, correct? then takes another 14 seconds to get to 100 (figures rounded up or down) it takes treble the time to do that extra 40 to get to 100 (7x3=21), same with the zonda (3 and a bit seconds to 60, 9 and a bit to 100). This isn't hard and eddies theory is no where near correct.
P.S Sorry for bringing this back up LOL
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|  |
| |
| |
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
|
|
|
| |
|
Membership:
Latest: 
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 1
Overall: 17122
Online Now [193]:
Visitors: 192
Members: 0
Staff Online Now:
Page Views:
Forums Home
Forum FAQ
Search
