Author
|
Message |
|
Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2010 3:22 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 07, 2010 Posts: 1810
Trade Rating: +2
Location: devon
|
|
snow_n_low wrote: |
^ perfect stance on 17s that |
cheers mate
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2010 3:24 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 08, 2010 Posts: 7045
Trade Rating: +5
Location: In the garage
|
|
Does nobody drive hot hatches as they were supposed to be driven? Or are they just McDonalds car park cars?
| | |
|
|
|
| | |
| 2001 GTi 138, Bilstein Sprint dampers, H&R springs, 21mm Peugeot Sport torsion bars, 22mm rear ARB, Peugeot Sport Group A wishbones, 283mm discs, Goodridge stainless hoses, Maniflow 304 grade 4-2-1 2.5" manifold and system, 200 cell cat, Richard Longman head, 45mm Jenvey throttle bodies, 9.5mm TB spacers, 90mm air horns, Jenvey throttle linkage, Jenvey fuel rail, Aeromotive and Goodridge fuel fittings and braided hose, ITG sausage filter, Radtec custom radiator, Piper Ultimate Road cams, Piper vernier pulleys, Omex 600 ECU. Saxo electric PAS pump, Vibra Technics engine mounts. Samco coolant hoses, TTV steel flywheel, 4.76 final drive ratio, 307 CC 180 ratios. 2019 BMW 530i. 2017 Mercedes C300 convertible. | |
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2010 3:26 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 07, 2010 Posts: 1810
Trade Rating: +2
Location: devon
|
|
Edward wrote: |
Does nobody drive hot hatches as they were supposed to be driven? Or are they just McDonalds car park cars? |
yep! i live in the middle of the country and 90% of the driving i do is fast windy b roads hence why i bought a hot hatch
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2010 3:31 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 07, 2010 Posts: 3978
Trade Rating: +8
Location: Leeds / West Midlands
|
|
rttam wrote: |
Edward wrote: |
Does nobody drive hot hatches as they were supposed to be driven? Or are they just McDonalds car park cars? |
yep! i live in the middle of the country and 90% of the driving i do is fast windy b roads hence why i bought a hot hatch |
No mine is a 1.1 there is nothing hot about it so i might as well tart it up and sit at maccies all night safe
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2010 3:44 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: May 10, 2010 Posts: 624
Trade Rating: +2
Location: london
|
|
Jay at the mo mine sits same as yours, seal panel wise it's even but for sum reason front arch looks higher then the back some times it jus depends on how low the collies allow u to go, I wernt happy so I took helper springs out n lowered front more, me rear is same as yours
But I think yours is spot on
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2010 3:53 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 15, 2010 Posts: 1848
Trade Rating: +6
Location: Leamington Spa
|
|
europug wrote: |
Jay at the mo mine sits same as yours, seal panel wise it's even but for sum reason front arch looks higher then the back some times it jus depends on how low the collies allow u to go, I wernt happy so I took helper springs out n lowered front more, me rear is same as yours
But I think yours is spot on |
sorry to steal thread but man i love your car haha
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2010 4:24 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 07, 2010 Posts: 5120
Trade Rating: +19
Location: Raunds, Northamptonshire
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2010 4:39 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: May 10, 2010 Posts: 624
Trade Rating: +2
Location: london
|
|
^. Wot he said lol
Kingdom cheers mate
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2010 4:42 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 08, 2010 Posts: 1322
Trade Rating: +4
Location: Rayleigh, essex
|
|
love how that sits ben!! not jealous at all............... lol
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2010 4:48 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 07, 2010 Posts: 5120
Trade Rating: +19
Location: Raunds, Northamptonshire
|
|
I do miss it
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Nov 16, 2010 11:03 am |
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 22, 2010 Posts: 103
Trade Rating: 0
Location: Mansfield
|
|
[quote="wardie_206"]
Hmm...agree that its sat low, but, if you were to straighten your front wheels i can guarantee (looking and going by this pic) that the gap between tyre and arch is MUCH greater than that of the rear, which...if what i've been reading off some of the ''professionals'' on here - is not nose down?
Pretty much, if not more so, in the same boat as me yet mine gets a hammering and yours gets praised....
Very nice car though mate
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Nov 16, 2010 11:08 am |
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 22, 2010 Posts: 103
Trade Rating: 0
Location: Mansfield
|
|
europug wrote: |
Jay at the mo mine sits same as yours, seal panel wise it's even but for sum reason front arch looks higher then the back some times it jus depends on how low the collies allow u to go, I wernt happy so I took helper springs out n lowered front more, me rear is same as yours
But I think yours is spot on |
COMPLETELY AGREE
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Nov 16, 2010 11:11 am |
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 22, 2010 Posts: 103
Trade Rating: 0
Location: Mansfield
|
|
Edward wrote: |
Does nobody drive hot hatches as they were supposed to be driven? Or are they just McDonalds car park cars? |
Nobody but you it seems...
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Nov 16, 2010 11:21 am |
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 07, 2010 Posts: 5120
Trade Rating: +19
Location: Raunds, Northamptonshire
|
|
Jay206-GTi wrote: |
Hmm...agree that its sat low, but, if you were to straighten your front wheels i can guarantee (looking and going by this pic) that the gap between tyre and arch is MUCH greater than that of the rear, which...if what i've been reading off some of the ''professionals'' on here - is not nose down?
Pretty much, if not more so, in the same boat as me yet mine gets a hammering and yours gets praised....
Very nice car though mate |
true true, this is how it was side on... i225.photobucket.com/a...o0029a.jpg
there was nose down, the way i can tell that is because a jack fitted under rear sill not at the front
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Nov 16, 2010 11:31 am |
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 08, 2010 Posts: 5400
Trade Rating: +105
Location: Stafford
|
|
Like it so much more, when as you say, it's flush to the ground. If you aren't finding it annoying to drive definately keep it.
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|