New Here?
Toggle Content
   

Toggle Content User Info
Welcome

Anonymous

Nickname
Password
Register

Membership:
Latest: heikkisj
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 17126

Online Now [68]:
Visitors: 67
Bots: 1
Members: 0
Staff Online Now:

No staff members are online!
Page Views:
Today: 15395
Total: 100299321

Toggle Content Main Menu
 General Info Goodies Search Web Stats Members
 Donations

 

Forums › The Car › 206 Problems › Which thermostat to look for or avoid for 2003 S16 138


 
 

Which thermostat to look for or avoid for 2003 S16 138
Forum Index206 Problems
Reply to topic Printer Friendly Page watchs.gif View Previous Topic View Next Topic
Author
Message
Bordonbert
PostPosted: Wed Mar 29, 2023 4:36 pm Up
Getting to like it here


Offline

Joined: Jul 05, 2022
Posts: 17
Trade Rating: 0


Hi guys. The thermostat on my 2003 GTi 138 seems to be stuck open as temperature is staying one notch low at around 80deg. If I am stuck in a crappy tailback on the M3 it takes a few minutes to climb to 90 and drifts on to just under 100 but then drops back to 90 as the fan kicks in. As soon as I drive off again it sinks back to 80. There seem to be no other issues with its running so I'm changing the thermostat as a first move.

I know the job is pretty simple, just drain, remove hose, remove 2x10mm bolts, swap, refit and bleed. I've got a lot of experience in general so don't see any real problems, but I'm a bit bewildered as to the number of makes of thermostat + housing kits there are around. I can go for something generic by guessing of course but are there any particular names to look for or avoid?

They mock and say ask a stupid question?
"A moment of embarrassment is better than a lifetime of ignorance".
View user's profile
Bordonbert
PostPosted: Thu Apr 13, 2023 3:23 pm Up
Getting to like it here


Offline

Joined: Jul 05, 2022
Posts: 17
Trade Rating: 0


No thoughts offered on this one so I just did what came naturally and replaced with a mid-price generic type. As parts were cheap I changed out the temperature sensor at the same time though that was just for convenience.

I opened the bottom hose connection and caught the coolant to have a look at it. It has been changed just a year or two ago and, while it is not overly expensive to replace, it was absolutely clean and fluorescent so I only drained a "headful". I checked this by opening up the highest point, the radiator top hose connection, to allow air in and followed with the actual thermostat housing connection afterwards. I did lose a little coolant in the process as you can imagine but it was less than a glassful and was easily topped up with a little fresh 50/50 mix. Checking the level in the header tank is a royal pain in the rear! A torch shone in the top or thought the side doesn't get through in daytime so I had to check it in the dark.

Now the point is not to chart the replacement of a thermostat, that's been done many times before, but there is one unusual aspect. I had received a couple of engine light warnings for "Anti-Pollution Fault". That was odd because the exhaust and cat are not too old and the sensors were replaced just before that too. The first had occurred when running at motorway speed. I checked this out with Torque and the fault code showed a Lambda Sensor Fault on Bank 1 Position 2. The rear sensor, only there for engine diagnostics, seemed shafted. However, as they do, it cleared itself a few starts later. Then a couple of weeks later it appeared again when I started up from cold. This time it wouldn't clear even through Torque.

So I replaced the thermostat which I had and and ordered a new sensor. Whaddya know, while waiting for the sensor to arrive the fault cleared again. I'm now wondering if the thermostat being soft and causing the engine to run colder than normal (steady 80degC instead of a steady 90degC) would have affected the mixture slightly and caused that fault to appear when the rear sensor was not reading what it expected permanently. I wonder was the diagnostic program assuming the sensor was faulty because the temperature was permanently low no doubt screwing what it expected to see for the mix.

Anyway, just an interesting observation for anyone who sees something similar. Anyone have any similar experience or knowledge of what was going on?

They mock and say ask a stupid question?
"A moment of embarrassment is better than a lifetime of ignorance".
View user's profile
Steve206
PostPosted: Sun Apr 16, 2023 4:25 pm Up
Paid up Member of the Info Exchange


Offline

Joined: Feb 07, 2010
Posts: 2718
Trade Rating: +6
Location: UK


The engine was probably running a bit rich as the ECU thought the engine was cold. I know what you mean about reading the water level, that plastic is so thick light doesn't shine through!
Work in Progress
View user's profile
Reply to topic Printer Friendly Page watchs.gif View Previous Topic View Next Topic All times are GMT
Forum Index206 Problems

Page 1 of 1
  You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum

 
We are not responsible for comments posted by our users, as they are the property of the poster
Interactive software released under GNU GPL, Code Credits, Privacy Policy