|
Author
|
Message |
|
|
 Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2011 10:41 am |
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 21, 2010
Posts: 271
Trade Rating: +3
Location: Bedfordshire
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2011 11:20 am |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 27, 2010
Posts: 11520
Trade Rating: +10
Location: What's it to you? ? ?
|
|
Chavtastic.
Pipercross or K & N panel filter in the original air box FTW 
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2011 11:22 am |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 08, 2010
Posts: 1709
Trade Rating: +18
Location: London
|
|
| MrBSI wrote: |
Chavtastic.
Pipercross or K & N panel filter in the original air box FTW |
Each to their own.
| | |
|
|
|
|
 | |  |
|
| Quote:: |
| Haven't got a pic but we all know what they look like. |
Being the picky sort - I really hate it when people say this. Yes we all know what it looks like - but we all want to see the condition that yours is in! | |
 | |  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2011 11:27 am |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 27, 2010
Posts: 11520
Trade Rating: +10
Location: What's it to you? ? ?
|
|
| juanfernandes wrote: |
| MrBSI wrote: |
Chavtastic.
Pipercross or K & N panel filter in the original air box FTW |
Each to their own. |
Pointless wasting money on cheap crap.
Save up & buy decent first time
Buy cheap = buy twice.
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2011 11:37 am |
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 21, 2010
Posts: 271
Trade Rating: +3
Location: Bedfordshire
|
|
Its only gonnabe in the car a week or so.
Anyways please no comments on what you think of cones as this isn't the point in the thread 
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2011 11:42 am |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 15, 2010
Posts: 1848
Trade Rating: +6
Location: Leamington Spa
|
|
i havent personally noticed much different but now i have been cammed i think a decent one will be orderd 
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2011 12:12 pm |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 08, 2010
Posts: 10151
Trade Rating: +12
|
|
always cone, always cheap.
4 pound a cone filter or a proper >80 pound green cone filter.
20 times difference seems really steep lol
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2011 1:02 pm |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 08, 2010
Posts: 1407
Trade Rating: +1
Location: Berkshire
|
|
K&N filter in airbox would be best
| | |
|
|
|
|
| | |
| New car 2011 / Thoruim grey , 207 1.4 Vti 16v Sport 95bhp , tinted rear windows.
Old car 2000/ 206 2.0 hdi. | |
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2011 1:04 pm |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 07, 2010
Posts: 5575
Trade Rating: +33
Location: Moscow
|
|
| Seabook wrote: |
always cone, always cheap.
4 pound a cone filter or a proper >80 pound green cone filter.
20 times difference seems really steep lol |
Or £25 K and N panel filter with lifetime guarantee.
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2011 1:18 pm |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 08, 2010
Posts: 10151
Trade Rating: +12
|
|
| tomd0801754 wrote: |
| Seabook wrote: |
always cone, always cheap.
4 pound a cone filter or a proper >80 pound green cone filter.
20 times difference seems really steep lol |
Or £25 K and N panel filter with lifetime guarantee. |
not enough space to use the oem air box.
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2011 1:23 pm |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 07, 2010
Posts: 681
Trade Rating: +5
Location: Orpington
|
|
| eddrj wrote: |
| K&N filter in airbox would be best |
i personally noticed a bigger change when i had a cone on than a panel element
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2011 1:25 pm |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 08, 2010
Posts: 10151
Trade Rating: +12
|
|
| XSIcheeseman wrote: |
| eddrj wrote: |
| K&N filter in airbox would be best |
i personally noticed a bigger change when i had a cone on than a panel element |
yes, is 10 thousand times noiser than before
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2011 1:27 pm |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 07, 2010
Posts: 681
Trade Rating: +5
Location: Orpington
|
|
| Seabook wrote: |
| XSIcheeseman wrote: |
| eddrj wrote: |
| K&N filter in airbox would be best |
i personally noticed a bigger change when i had a cone on than a panel element |
yes, is 10 thousand times noiser than before |
not more noise , it seemed more resposive
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2011 1:28 pm |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 07, 2010
Posts: 13077
Trade Rating: +65
Location: England
|
|
| eddrj wrote: |
| K&N filter in airbox would be best |
Depends what you class as the 'best'
A paper filter has the best air filtration
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2011 4:29 am |
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 21, 2010
Posts: 271
Trade Rating: +3
Location: Bedfordshire
|
|
Stay on topic please!!!
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Membership:
Latest: 
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 17132
Online Now [324]:
Visitors: 323
Members: 0
Staff Online Now:
Page Views:
General
Forums Home
Forum FAQ
Search
