|
Author
|
Message |
|
|
 Posted: Wed Sep 21, 2011 4:02 am |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 12, 2011
Posts: 37
Trade Rating: 0
Location: Away from here!
|
 |
...
| |  |
|
|
 |
Last edited by BLU-PUG on Sat Sep 24, 2011 8:43 am; edited 1 time in total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Sep 21, 2011 4:12 am |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 10, 2010
Posts: 4014
Trade Rating: +2
|
|
| BLU-PUG wrote: |
| M60SHW wrote: |
| BLU-PUG wrote: |
Fiesta ST is heavy and slow in comparison to other hot hatches, thirsty too.
|
Am repping the ST corner!
Peugeot 206 GTi (99-06) 2.0 (180bhp) 3d Weight 1125 kg
MPG
32
Insurance Group
28
0-60 mph
7.5 s
Ford Fiesta ST (05-08) 2.0 ST 3d Weight 1137 kg
MPG
38
Insurance Group
26
0-60 mph
7.9 s
Also has cheaper road tax miles cheaper insurance (I found)and very easy to modify (change the flexi for a miltek and a k&n filter and you looking at 165 bhp roundabouts)  and muchos better the drive than the 180 imo
EDIT. nearly forgot timing chain over belt anyday  |
Try comparing to a proper hot hatch, not a 206
Renault Clio 182 1998cc 3dr Weight 1070kg
mpg
34.9mpg
Insurance group
16D
0-60
6.7 s
67kgs lighter than the ST, not quit as good mpg wise (although I don't believe for 1min the the ST can achieve 38mpg except at 56mph on a motorway) and over a second quicker to 60!
Oh and btw I'm a huge Fiesta fan and have owned them on and off for 18 years now! The ST was just a bad design, which is a shame really as Ford could have made it so much better! |
People keep quoting all these figures and most of them are bulls**t anyway.
The clio 182 does not weigh 1070Kg thats the 172 cup.
The actuall differneces in 0-60 times between a clio 172, 182 + cups are in reality basicly the same as a 180.
So all figures are b******s.
Thats my view, if the OP doesnt like his car drop an anvil on it, it looks s**t anyway, go out and test drive some other cars and find one you like.
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Sep 21, 2011 4:54 am |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 12, 2011
Posts: 37
Trade Rating: 0
Location: Away from here!
|
|
...
| | |
|
|
|
|
Last edited by BLU-PUG on Sat Sep 24, 2011 8:43 am; edited 1 time in total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Sep 21, 2011 5:39 am |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 09, 2010
Posts: 397
Trade Rating: 0
Location: Stoke on Trent
|
|
| Quote:: |
| Try comparing to a proper hot hatch, not a 206 |
How is the 180 not a proper hot hatch ?
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Sep 21, 2011 5:44 am |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 07, 2010
Posts: 3085
Trade Rating: +12
Location: Essex
|
|
| Andy180 wrote: |
| Quote:: |
| Try comparing to a proper hot hatch, not a 206 |
How is the 180 not a proper hot hatch ? |
because its cool???? 
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Sep 21, 2011 5:52 am |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 07, 2010
Posts: 4455
Trade Rating: +1
Location: Essex
|
|
| Andy180 wrote: |
| Quote:: |
| Try comparing to a proper hot hatch, not a 206 |
How is the 180 not a proper hot hatch ? |
Youd think it was the anti - Christ on this site 
Still, I loved mine despite the haters 
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Sep 21, 2011 5:59 am |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 09, 2010
Posts: 397
Trade Rating: 0
Location: Stoke on Trent
|
|
| Quote:: |
| Youd think it was the anti - Christ on this site |
i no its ridiculous 
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Sep 21, 2011 7:13 am |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 29, 2010
Posts: 244
Trade Rating: +2
Location: East Sussex
|
|
Did we ever get to how much the budget was for the owner of a mid range 206 that doesn't like it after doing nothing to it?
As said earlier pretty much any car can be fun. I love my 1.4 Glx may not be fast but for what it is its fun enough till i win the lottery then i will upgrade it and get a super car.
If you don't like your job you change it, if you don't like your car do the same. Anyway please stop whining end of the day your the driver and if you can't make it fun then your driving must be poor.
5 pages and i don't think we got anywhere really uther than comparing 2 cars one was 3 up the other unknown. Get the Audi better traction and turbo just when they go wrong like big they go wrong big end of my personal rant 
| | |
|
|
|
|
 | |  |
| 206 3dr 1.4 GLX modified slightly, Lowered 35mm on full Gmax kit, 17" AEZ xylo alloys 205/45/17, 3.5" Savage back box, | |
 | |  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Sep 21, 2011 10:37 am |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 07, 2010
Posts: 3085
Trade Rating: +12
Location: Essex
|
|
nice rant
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Sep 21, 2011 10:39 am |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 08, 2010
Posts: 7045
Trade Rating: +5
Location: In the garage
|
|
It's ages since we've hd one of these silly 'my car is faster' and 'that good car is s**t' discussions. They don't get any better.
Fact is the Fiesta ST is virtually identical in performance to the 206 GTi. It was a very good little car, could have done with a bit more power simply because the chassis was more than capable of handling it. There is certainly lots of potential with the engines.
| | |
|
|
|
|
| | |
| 2001 GTi 138, Bilstein Sprint dampers, H&R springs, 21mm Peugeot Sport torsion bars, 22mm rear ARB, Peugeot Sport Group A wishbones, 283mm discs, Goodridge stainless hoses, Maniflow 304 grade 4-2-1 2.5" manifold and system, 200 cell cat, Richard Longman head, 45mm Jenvey throttle bodies, 9.5mm TB spacers, 90mm air horns, Jenvey throttle linkage, Jenvey fuel rail, Aeromotive and Goodridge fuel fittings and braided hose, ITG sausage filter, Radtec custom radiator, Piper Ultimate Road cams, Piper vernier pulleys, Omex 600 ECU. Saxo electric PAS pump, Vibra Technics engine mounts. Samco coolant hoses, TTV steel flywheel, 4.76 final drive ratio, 307 CC 180 ratios. 2019 BMW 530i. 2017 Mercedes C300 convertible. | |
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Sep 21, 2011 10:45 am |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 07, 2010
Posts: 3085
Trade Rating: +12
Location: Essex
|
|
If we take away the SLIGHT bias that may be on here toward the 206 I think your right.... I would love someone to come to me with a Fiesta and say "tune it, heres my wallet"
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Sep 21, 2011 10:48 am |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 07, 2010
Posts: 3948
Trade Rating: +7
Location: A Track near you ;)
|
|
| Big_Rich180 wrote: |
| BLU-PUG wrote: |
| M60SHW wrote: |
| BLU-PUG wrote: |
Fiesta ST is heavy and slow in comparison to other hot hatches, thirsty too.
|
Am repping the ST corner!
Peugeot 206 GTi (99-06) 2.0 (180bhp) 3d Weight 1125 kg
MPG
32
Insurance Group
28
0-60 mph
7.5 s
Ford Fiesta ST (05-08) 2.0 ST 3d Weight 1137 kg
MPG
38
Insurance Group
26
0-60 mph
7.9 s
Also has cheaper road tax miles cheaper insurance (I found)and very easy to modify (change the flexi for a miltek and a k&n filter and you looking at 165 bhp roundabouts) and muchos better the drive than the 180 imo
EDIT. nearly forgot timing chain over belt anyday |
Try comparing to a proper hot hatch, not a 206
Renault Clio 182 1998cc 3dr Weight 1070kg
mpg
34.9mpg
Insurance group
16D
0-60
6.7 s
67kgs lighter than the ST, not quit as good mpg wise (although I don't believe for 1min the the ST can achieve 38mpg except at 56mph on a motorway) and over a second quicker to 60!
Oh and btw I'm a huge Fiesta fan and have owned them on and off for 18 years now! The ST was just a bad design, which is a shame really as Ford could have made it so much better! |
People keep quoting all these figures and most of them are bulls**t anyway.
The clio 182 does not weigh 1070Kg thats the 172 cup.
The actuall differneces in 0-60 times between a clio 172, 182 + cups are in reality basicly the same as a 180.
So all figures are b******s.
Thats my view, if the OP doesnt like his car drop an anvil on it, it looks s**t anyway, go out and test drive some other cars and find one you like. |
197 is better than all mentioned above 
| | |
|
|
|
|
| | |
| Renault Clio III RS - Race Car
Renault Trafic - Daily & Tow Van
Former Poverty 206 XS 1.6Turbo Owner | |
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Sep 21, 2011 11:02 am |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 16, 2010
Posts: 1315
Trade Rating: +3
Location: Ips
|
|
How funny ! Keep your 206 proberly the best car you will have for a while!
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
WARNING: This User Has Had Bad Trade Feedback In The Past
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Sep 21, 2011 11:17 am |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 07, 2010
Posts: 5575
Trade Rating: +33
Location: Moscow
|
|
| macj wrote: |
| If we take away the SLIGHT bias that may be on here toward the 206 I think your right.... I would love someone to come to me with a Fiesta and say "tune it, heres my wallet" |
PM Shaw - M60SHW ...
(Yes, I am actually being serious)
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Sep 21, 2011 11:21 am |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 29, 2011
Posts: 71
Trade Rating: 0
Location: From Birmingham- Live in Cornwall
|
|
| Coolspot wrote: |
Did we ever get to how much the budget was for the owner of a mid range 206 that doesn't like it after doing nothing to it?
As said earlier pretty much any car can be fun. I love my 1.4 Glx may not be fast but for what it is its fun enough till i win the lottery then i will upgrade it and get a super car.
If you don't like your job you change it, if you don't like your car do the same. Anyway please stop whining end of the day your the driver and if you can't make it fun then your driving must be poor.
5 pages and i don't think we got anywhere really uther than comparing 2 cars one was 3 up the other unknown. Get the Audi better traction and turbo just when they go wrong like big they go wrong big end of my personal rant |
Car is sold, just put deposit down on a nice dark blue ZR 160
oh and i was bored as im 20 and with me buying the 206 as a little cheap run around wile got my flat sorted... with having a 1.4 ZR (105bhp standerd) 2 years ago i just was so bored with the 206. and also going from a zetec S 1.6 turbo down i was bored out my brian driving...'plus its abit girly iv been told by all my mates' LOL
who ever said that the zr is dated i agree, but the overall driving is nice....ugly inside but outside looks half decent....just cant beat the handling and pull it has
P.S anyone wanna buy my rear lexus lights? £12 posted hehe
| | |
|
|
|
|
| | |
| Carbon Wrap did look good, untill the chavs in there 1L corsa's and saxo's start doing it.....same story as Lacoste and Stone island, Now its takky! | |
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
Membership:
Latest: 
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 17130
Online Now [549]:
Visitors: 548
Members: 0
Staff Online Now:
Page Views:
General
Forums Home
Forum FAQ
Search
