Author
|
Message |
|
Posted: Thu Feb 21, 2013 7:43 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 21, 2013 Posts: 1
Trade Rating: 0
|
|
hi i've just bought a 206 gti 180 version because they are fairly cheap to buy. plus my brother has one and it looks amazing, though he's pretty clueless.
i had a brief test of the car today but it doesn't seem as quick as the clio sport that i had yet its meant to be very similar? i thought the difference would not really be noticable.
im a crap driver and i don't do 0-60s as it ruins clutches and imo it's just being silly but i did do a midrange 3rd gear pull while testing it today, can someone tell me if it seems right? i want to make sure that it seems to pull as it should as i haven't had a pug before.
i timed 40-70 flat out in third gear = 5.5 seconds
it is completely standard and i hope to do a project thread soon.
thanks x
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2013 3:13 am |
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 07, 2010 Posts: 2720
Trade Rating: +6
Location: UK
|
|
Your opening a can of worms here, but some will say the clio sport is the better car performance wise. Which model did you have?
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2013 5:25 am |
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 07, 2010 Posts: 4455
Trade Rating: +1
Location: Essex
|
|
Long story short-
The 180 only has 24 bhp & any other 'hot hatch' is far better, especially the 138 & skodas
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2013 10:29 am |
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 08, 2012 Posts: 512
Trade Rating: +2
Location: Scunthorpe
|
|
E5GDM wrote: |
Long story short-
The 180 only has 24 bhp & any other 'hot hatch' is far better, especially the 138 & skodas |
Exactly the above ^^^ haha
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|